Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook    Log in with Windows Live    Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


Imam Ja'afar as Sadiq (ra)


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
36 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 01 July 2011 - 08:13 PM

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 26 June 2011 - 07:38 AM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 26 June 2011 - 04:21 AM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 22 June 2011 - 09:16 PM, said:

Salamalaikum can any of the brothers like Farid, efendi, mufti etc post any sort of Tawtheeq and praises mentioned by scholars of Ahlesunnah for these Imam from Ahlebayt.

8- ‘Ali ibn Moosa al-Kaadim (148-203 AH) whom they call al-Rida (Reza)

9- Muhammad al-Jawaad ibn ‘Ali al-Rida’ (195-220 AH) whom they call al-Taqiy

10- ‘Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad (212-254 AH) whom they call al-Naqiy

11- al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260) whom they call al-Zakiy<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break">


check jami's shahadatul nabuwah, sibt ibn jauzi's tadhkiratul khwas, idrees bhojani's khandaan nabuwah
No need to check your(shia books), because sibt ibn jawzi was an undercover shia as stated by imam dhahabi. So please stop quoting shia text and i know you are obssesed of quoting those, because you have no ground to stand infront of AHlesunnah without relying on such stuff...



asalamu alykum,
                                       mualana jaami was a famous sufi, he wrote shawadatul naboowah , mohd idrees bhojani was the amir of jamaite ahl hadith and wrote khandaan nabowat , as far as sibt ibn jauzi goes , just because he narrated merits of the progeny of Prophet(saw) doesnt make him a rafidi, he was the grandson of ibn jauzi who dahabi considers as the master of history and fiqh, if asllegations against him can be levelled at sibt ibn jauzi, the same can be levelled at the tutor of dahabi, ibn taimiyah and others in all fairness, sibt ibn jauzi work finds some resonance ibn ibn hajar haytami's books. was he a shia too. the allegations were also made against imam shafei, imam tabari, imam nisai..what about that?
Dhahabi says about sibt ibn jauzi in Mizan al-Itidal Volume 4 page 471:
’Sibt Ibn Jauzi was a great learned scholar and was a teacher of Hanafies”.


He was following the Hanafi school of Jurisprudential thought, he was known for his high intellect and diligence in research.

Born in Baghdad, in his formative years he was raised on Hanbali educational materials, yet when his family moved to Mosul, Iraq, he began his Hanafi education.

He was known for his book "Mir’at al-zaman" his famous work of History, that is reported to be forty volumes long in his own handwriting.



#22 OFFLINE   swords_of_sunnah

swords_of_sunnah

    Sunni Researcher and Writer

  • Topic Starter
  • Moderator
  • Topics: 612
  • Posts: 6,786
  • Thanked: 328 times
  • Joined: 01-February 09
  • Local time: 08:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida (US)
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 01 July 2011 - 08:40 PM

View Postomarashidwani, on 01 July 2011 - 08:13 PM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 26 June 2011 - 07:38 AM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 26 June 2011 - 04:21 AM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 22 June 2011 - 09:16 PM, said:

Salamalaikum can any of the brothers like Farid, efendi, mufti etc post any sort of Tawtheeq and praises mentioned by scholars of Ahlesunnah for these Imam from Ahlebayt.

8- ‘Ali ibn Moosa al-Kaadim (148-203 AH) whom they call al-Rida (Reza)

9- Muhammad al-Jawaad ibn ‘Ali al-Rida’ (195-220 AH) whom they call al-Taqiy

10- ‘Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad (212-254 AH) whom they call al-Naqiy

11- al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260) whom they call al-Zakiy<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break">


check jami's shahadatul nabuwah, sibt ibn jauzi's tadhkiratul khwas, idrees bhojani's khandaan nabuwah
No need to check your(shia books), because sibt ibn jawzi was an undercover shia as stated by imam dhahabi. So please stop quoting shia text and i know you are obssesed of quoting those, because you have no ground to stand infront of AHlesunnah without relying on such stuff...



asalamu alykum,
                                   mualana jaami was a famous sufi, he wrote shawadatul naboowah , mohd idrees bhojani was the amir of jamaite ahl hadith and wrote khandaan nabowat , as far as sibt ibn jauzi goes , just because he narrated merits of the progeny of Prophet(saw) doesnt make him a rafidi, he was the grandson of ibn jauzi who dahabi considers as the master of history and fiqh, if asllegations against him can be levelled at sibt ibn jauzi, the same can be levelled at the tutor of dahabi, ibn taimiyah and others in all fairness, sibt ibn jauzi work finds some resonance ibn ibn hajar haytami's books. was he a shia too. the allegations were also made against imam shafei, imam tabari, imam nisai..what about that?
Dhahabi says about sibt ibn jauzi in Mizan al-Itidal Volume 4 page 471:
’Sibt Ibn Jauzi was a great learned scholar and was a teacher of Hanafies”.


He was following the Hanafi school of Jurisprudential thought, he was known for his high intellect and diligence in research.

Born in Baghdad, in his formative years he was raised on Hanbali educational materials, yet when his family moved to Mosul, Iraq, he began his Hanafi education.

He was known for his book "Mir’at al-zaman" his famous work of History, that is reported to be forty volumes long in his own handwriting.




Yusuf Fargali, known as the grandson of (Sibt) Ibn Al_Jawzi:
He is the author of (Miraat Al-Zaman). Al-Dhahabi said: “ He has  authored (Miraat Al-Zaman) and included very odd narrations in it  (manakir). I do not think he is thiqqa in things he reports rather he  exaggerates and goes aside. He then converted to Rafidism , and authored  a book to this effect. Shiekh Muhiydin said: When the news of Sibt Ibn  Al-Jawzi’s death reached my grandfather, he said: “ May Allah not have  mercy on him. He was a Rafidi”

And we know that many shias used to practise fiqh of suni madhab but they used to have rafidi beliefs, BUT THIS DOES goes down the throat of RAfidis, so i can understand ur pain.....

secondly the other two scholars books seems to be secondary sources...
Allah is the MAULA of those who believe, whereas the disbelievers have no MAULA (Quran 47:11)

HASBUNALLAHU WA NEMAL WAKEEL, NEMAL MAULA WA NEMAN NASEER
Translation: "Allah (Alone) is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs (for us); what an Excellent Maula (Patron, Lord) and what an Excellent Helper!

#23 OFFLINE   swords_of_sunnah

swords_of_sunnah

    Sunni Researcher and Writer

  • Topic Starter
  • Moderator
  • Topics: 612
  • Posts: 6,786
  • Thanked: 328 times
  • Joined: 01-February 09
  • Local time: 08:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida (US)
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 01 July 2011 - 08:45 PM

btw instead of citing books names, why dont you cite any statement of praise for

10th imam of shias ‘Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad (212-254 AH) whom they call al-Naqiy

and 11th imam of shias- al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260) whom they call  al-Zakiy

and need info from the book of ahle hadith scholar not sibt ibn jawzi...
Allah is the MAULA of those who believe, whereas the disbelievers have no MAULA (Quran 47:11)

HASBUNALLAHU WA NEMAL WAKEEL, NEMAL MAULA WA NEMAN NASEER
Translation: "Allah (Alone) is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs (for us); what an Excellent Maula (Patron, Lord) and what an Excellent Helper!

#24 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:45 AM

View PostJhangvi, on 01 July 2011 - 05:32 PM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 01 July 2011 - 07:12 AM, said:

Muslim bin Hajjaj in his Sahih, Volume VII, page 122; Abu Dawud in his Sahih; Tirmidhi in his Sunan, Part 2, page 307; Nisa'i in his Khasa'is, page 30; Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal in his Musnad, Volume III, page 14-17, Volume IV, page 26 and 59, and Volume V, page 182 and 189, Hakim in Mustadrak, Volume III, page 109 and 148; Hafiz Abu Nu'aim Isfahani in his Hilyatu'l-Auliya, Volume I, page 355; Sibt Ibn Jauzi in his Tadhkira, page 182; Ibn Athir Jazari in his Usudu'l-Ghaiba, Volume II, page 12 and Volume III, page 147; Hamidi in Jama' Baina's-Sahihain; Razin in his Jama' Baina's-Siha-e-Sitta; Tibrani in his Ta'rikh-e-Kabir; Dhahabi in his Talkhis-e-Mustadrak; Ibn Abd Rabbih in his Iqdu'l-Farid; Muhammad bin Talha Shafi'i in is Matalibu's-Su'ul; Khatib Khawarizmi in Manaqib; Sulayman Balkhi Hanafi in Yanabiu'l-Mawadda, Chapter page 18, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 32, 34, 95, 115, 126, 199 and 230, with slight narrations in words; ir Seyyed Ali Hamadani in the second Mawadda of his Mawaddatu'l-Qurba; Ibn Abi'l-Hadid in Sharh Nahju'l-Balagha; Shablanji in Nuru'l-Absar, page 99; Nuru'd-Din bin Sabbagh Maliki in Fusulu'l Muhimma, page 25; Hamwaini in Fara'idu's-Simtain; Imam Tha'labi in Tafsir Kashfu'l-Bayan; Sam'ani and Ibn Maghazili Shafi'i in Manaqib; Muhammad bin Yusuf Ganji Shafi'i in Kifayatu'l-Talib, Chapter I, in the account of the authenticity of the sermon of Ghadir Khum and also in Chapter 62, page 130; Muhammad bin Sa'ad Katib in Tabaqa, Volume 4, page 8; Fakhru'd-Din Razi in Tafsir Kabir, Volume 3, under the verse of Etesam, page 18; Ibn Kathir Damishqi in Tafsir, Volume 4, under the verse of Mawadda, page 113, Ibn Hajar Makki in Sawa'iq-e-Muhriqa; pages 75, 87, 90, 99 and 136 with variations of words.
For Allah's sake, stop quoting craps from Shia websites. Stop giving logics based on Rafidah texts!

Ref: Text Copied from Rafidah website (Peshawar Nights)
http://www.al-islam....shawar/3.5.html
Asalamu Alykum,
                                 i have posted the references from a blog debating the authenticity of hadith. never knew the shia used the same references somewhere, maybe they picked it from the blog itself. however, as the famous hadith goes" dont look at the talker, look at the talk"
the refrences are valid. but i apologize for any offence.
wasalam

#25 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:54 AM

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 01 July 2011 - 08:40 PM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 01 July 2011 - 08:13 PM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 26 June 2011 - 07:38 AM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 26 June 2011 - 04:21 AM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 22 June 2011 - 09:16 PM, said:

Salamalaikum can any of the brothers like Farid, efendi, mufti etc post any sort of Tawtheeq and praises mentioned by scholars of Ahlesunnah for these Imam from Ahlebayt.

8- ‘Ali ibn Moosa al-Kaadim (148-203 AH) whom they call al-Rida (Reza)

9- Muhammad al-Jawaad ibn ‘Ali al-Rida’ (195-220 AH) whom they call al-Taqiy

10- ‘Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad (212-254 AH) whom they call al-Naqiy

11- al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260) whom they call al-Zakiy<br style="mso-special-character:line-break"> <br style="mso-special-character:line-break">


check jami's shahadatul nabuwah, sibt ibn jauzi's tadhkiratul khwas, idrees bhojani's khandaan nabuwah
No need to check your(shia books), because sibt ibn jawzi was an undercover shia as stated by imam dhahabi. So please stop quoting shia text and i know you are obssesed of quoting those, because you have no ground to stand infront of AHlesunnah without relying on such stuff...



asalamu alykum,
                               mualana jaami was a famous sufi, he wrote shawadatul naboowah , mohd idrees bhojani was the amir of jamaite ahl hadith and wrote khandaan nabowat , as far as sibt ibn jauzi goes , just because he narrated merits of the progeny of Prophet(saw) doesnt make him a rafidi, he was the grandson of ibn jauzi who dahabi considers as the master of history and fiqh, if asllegations against him can be levelled at sibt ibn jauzi, the same can be levelled at the tutor of dahabi, ibn taimiyah and others in all fairness, sibt ibn jauzi work finds some resonance ibn ibn hajar haytami's books. was he a shia too. the allegations were also made against imam shafei, imam tabari, imam nisai..what about that?
Dhahabi says about sibt ibn jauzi in Mizan al-Itidal Volume 4 page 471:
’Sibt Ibn Jauzi was a great learned scholar and was a teacher of Hanafies”.


He was following the Hanafi school of Jurisprudential thought, he was known for his high intellect and diligence in research.

Born in Baghdad, in his formative years he was raised on Hanbali educational materials, yet when his family moved to Mosul, Iraq, he began his Hanafi education.

He was known for his book "Mir’at al-zaman" his famous work of History, that is reported to be forty volumes long in his own handwriting.




Yusuf Fargali, known as the grandson of (Sibt) Ibn Al_Jawzi:
He is the author of (Miraat Al-Zaman). Al-Dhahabi said: “ He has  authored (Miraat Al-Zaman) and included very odd narrations in it  (manakir). I do not think he is thiqqa in things he reports rather he  exaggerates and goes aside. He then converted to Rafidism , and authored  a book to this effect. Shiekh Muhiydin said: When the news of Sibt Ibn  Al-Jawzi’s death reached my grandfather, he said: “ May Allah not have  mercy on him. He was a Rafidi”

And we know that many shias used to practise fiqh of suni madhab but they used to have rafidi beliefs, BUT THIS DOES goes down the throat of RAfidis, so i can understand ur pain.....

secondly the other two scholars books seems to be secondary sources...

salam,
brother you have to understand that sometimes there have been exaggerations made by the scholars. imam shafei was labelled a rafidi, ibn kathir  and dahabi himself were labelled nasibis alongwith ibn taimiyah, imam tabari had to undergone same slanderings,. imam nasai was killed. what matters is the essence of thought regarding scholars. the book that you mentioned of sibt ibn jauzio is called tadhkiratul khwass. in the book he has made references from the texts of his grandfather ibn jauzi(ra) who was himself called the master of history by dahabi. just because the book highlighted the merits of ahl bait it is injustice to call it a rafidi text. what about the books written by other great scholars like ibn jauzi, jalal ud din sututi, shah abdul aziz muhaddith dehalvi, shah abdul haqq muhaddith dehalvi, imam ibn hajar haytami, ibn khaldun etc.
you better check the writings of ibn tamiyah, dahabi and ibn kathir. if you apply the same criterion to them you will come to know that  they themselves show shades of nasb. be fair and just as the Quran ordains us.

#26 OFFLINE   Jhangvi

Jhangvi

    Technical Admin

  • Admin
  • Topics: 357
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Thanked: 725 times
  • Joined: 27-November 04
  • Local time: 05:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:01 AM

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 01 July 2011 - 08:40 PM, said:

Yusuf Fargali, known as the grandson of (Sibt) Ibn Al_Jawzi:
He is the author of (Miraat Al-Zaman). Al-Dhahabi said: “ He has  authored (Miraat Al-Zaman) and included very odd narrations in it  (manakir). I do not think he is thiqqa in things he reports rather he  exaggerates and goes aside. He then converted to Rafidism , and authored  a book to this effect. Shiekh Muhiydin said: When the news of Sibt Ibn  Al-Jawzi’s death reached my grandfather, he said: “ May Allah not have  mercy on him. He was a Rafidi”
Akhi, do check some more info on Sibt Ibne Jawzi as brother Hot Ice highlighted in one of his post in another thread:

http://islamic-forum...indpost&p=91251

And when it is said unto them (Kuffars): Believe as these people [Sahabah {R.A}] believe; they say: "Shall we believe as these foolish believe? Alert! they (Kuffars) are the foolish but they know not. {Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah#13}


222 Urdu Books on Shia - ردِ شیعہ پر 222 اردو کتابیں


#27 OFFLINE   swords_of_sunnah

swords_of_sunnah

    Sunni Researcher and Writer

  • Topic Starter
  • Moderator
  • Topics: 612
  • Posts: 6,786
  • Thanked: 328 times
  • Joined: 01-February 09
  • Local time: 08:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida (US)
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:10 AM

Quote

btw instead of citing books names, why dont you cite any statement of praise for

10th imam of shias ‘Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad (212-254 AH) whom they call al-Naqiy

and 11th imam of shias- al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260) whom they call  al-Zakiy

and need info from the book of ahle hadith scholar not sibt ibn jawzi...

bumped for rashidwani...... I guess the shia websites dont contain info abt theses websites from sunni books, thats why our frnd didnt find anything to post.
Allah is the MAULA of those who believe, whereas the disbelievers have no MAULA (Quran 47:11)

HASBUNALLAHU WA NEMAL WAKEEL, NEMAL MAULA WA NEMAN NASEER
Translation: "Allah (Alone) is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs (for us); what an Excellent Maula (Patron, Lord) and what an Excellent Helper!

#28 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM

View PostJhangvi, on 02 July 2011 - 07:01 AM, said:

View Postswords_of_sunnah, on 01 July 2011 - 08:40 PM, said:

Yusuf Fargali, known as the grandson of (Sibt) Ibn Al_Jawzi:
He is the author of (Miraat Al-Zaman). Al-Dhahabi said: “ He has  authored (Miraat Al-Zaman) and included very odd narrations in it  (manakir). I do not think he is thiqqa in things he reports rather he  exaggerates and goes aside. He then converted to Rafidism , and authored  a book to this effect. Shiekh Muhiydin said: When the news of Sibt Ibn  Al-Jawzi’s death reached my grandfather, he said: “ May Allah not have  mercy on him. He was a Rafidi”
Akhi, do check some more info on Sibt Ibne Jawzi as brother Hot Ice highlighted in one of his post in another thread:

http://islamic-forum...indpost&p=91251

if sibt ibn jauzi becomes a rafidi by quoting some exaggerations you claim. then wat is your opinion on imam bukhari, imam nmuslim, imam nisai, etc the masters of hadith who directly reported traditions from rafidis. please answer fairly.
secondly, what is your opinion about the historians, muhaddiths and scholars who published in their books the incidents that blot the character of prophet(saw) like the incident of bani quraizah, the satanic verses incident. please answer fairly.
ali, hassan, hussain, fatime(ra) were both sahabis and ahl bait. the books that contain filth against them. what is the opinion of yours on them. answer fairly.

if any scholar in his writings expresses his deficit of love of sahaba and ahl bait. what is your opinion on him. answer fairly.


answer me please.

#29 OFFLINE   swords_of_sunnah

swords_of_sunnah

    Sunni Researcher and Writer

  • Topic Starter
  • Moderator
  • Topics: 612
  • Posts: 6,786
  • Thanked: 328 times
  • Joined: 01-February 09
  • Local time: 08:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida (US)
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 05:58 PM

Its the view of sunni scholars not JUST Mine.. you are superior to them ? mr undercover......... :P

btw it seem,s you are just a copy pasting parrot nothing else, you just copy paste what is found on shia websites, where as when i asked you a question in post 23, you dont have any clue for that, you dont even dare to touch that.. what a pitty
Allah is the MAULA of those who believe, whereas the disbelievers have no MAULA (Quran 47:11)

HASBUNALLAHU WA NEMAL WAKEEL, NEMAL MAULA WA NEMAN NASEER
Translation: "Allah (Alone) is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs (for us); what an Excellent Maula (Patron, Lord) and what an Excellent Helper!

#30 OFFLINE   Jhangvi

Jhangvi

    Technical Admin

  • Admin
  • Topics: 357
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Thanked: 725 times
  • Joined: 27-November 04
  • Local time: 05:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:22 PM

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if sibt ibn jauzi becomes a rafidi by quoting some exaggerations you claim. then wat is your opinion on imam bukhari, imam nmuslim, imam nisai, etc the masters of hadith who directly reported traditions from rafidis. please answer fairly.
First of all let be very clear that there is a huge difference between mentioning some exaggerations and mentioning Shia filth. Exaggerations if remain within the limits, can be debatable; but when such so-called exaggerations go beyond with the Shia belief, are certainly not even worthy enough to talk about. So, open your eyes, read carefully and understand what filth Sibt Ibne Jawzi has spoken in his book. The reference for, I have already quoted in my last post.

Secondly you are so keen to ask the status of our Muhaditheen, that why is so, they have quoted few of the Ahadith in their books containing Shia narrators? Well, I believe you are from sub-continent Indo-Pak and I am pretty sure you must be knowing Urdu language; the answer to the same query has already been answered by one of our respected forum member Hot Ice in a thread. I'm quoting here for your question, and if let suppose you not understand, let me know I will translate the same in English.

View PostHot Ice, on 22 May 2011 - 08:26 PM, said:

Actually hamare taqreban tamam Ahl-e-Sunnat mohadiseen is bat pe mutafiq hain ke kisi riwayat mai agar koi Shia ravi aa jye to usay yaksar reject nahi kya jye ga balke us riwayat ko qubool karne se pehle kuch usooli baton ka khyal rakhna zaroori hai. Waise to usool-e-hadees mai is mozu pe mohadiseen ki taweel behes aur jarah mojood hai laikin tamam bhaion aur behno ki asani aur unke ilm ke lye is ka khulasa bata deta hoon.

Mohadiseen ne Ahl-e-Sunnat ke tareeq ki kisi riwayat mai Shia ravi ke mojood hone per us riwayat ko radd (reject) karne ya qubool karne ki teen (3) sharait bayan ki hain. Kuch ne in 3 sharait ke zail mai kuch khas batain bhi bayan ki hain laikin majority ne jo 3 ahm sharait per itefaq kia hai wo ye hain:-

1. Awal to us ravi ka siqa (sacha/sudooq) hona lazmi hai. Agar wo ravi siqa na ho aur na hi us ke siqa hone ki koi shahadat mojood ho to phir usay wahen radd (reject) kar dya jye ga. Laikin agar to ravi siqa hai aur us ke siqa hone ka saboot ya shahadat bhi mojood hai to phir is bat ki bunyad pe point # 2 aur point # 3 ko daikha jye ga.

Lehaza mandrja zail ye do points ( # 2 aur # 3 ) us ravi ke siqa hone ke sath mashroot hain:-

2. Agar wo ravi Ahl-e-Biddat mai se ho (kharji ho, rafzi ho, murjaa ho, nasabi ho, mutazili ho, qaddria ho) aur us ka aqeda ya biddat agar ghulu pe mabni ho yani sabb-o-shitam pe ya ghalez ya sakht ho to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar us ka aqeda ya biddat ghulu pe mabni na ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

3. Agar wo ravi apne aqeday (point # 1) ka daee (dawat dene wala) hai ya munazir (munazra kar ke apne aqeday ki taraf qail karne wala) hai to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar wo daee na ho aur na hi munazir ho aur agar us ki bayan karda riwayat se us ke mazhab ko taqwiat na pohnchti ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

Ye yad rahe ke point # 2 aur # 3 siqa hone ki shart ke sath hain aur in dono points ko aik sath daikha jye ga. Ye nahi ke siqa hone ke sath sirf wo point # 2 ki shart pe pura utarta hai ya point # 3 ki shart pe. Point # 2 aur # 3 ko aik sath daikha jye ga laikin us ke lye shart siqa hona lazmi hai.
Hope it will suffice you  :RA Anha:

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

secondly, what is your opinion about the historians, muhaddiths and scholars who published in their books the incidents that blot the character of prophet(saw) like the incident of bani quraizah, the satanic verses incident. please answer fairly.
Present us here any such incident with Sahih chain, we would love to answer such  :RA Anha: But mind you, the incident must be with complete and Sahih chain, we don't treat jokes!

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

ali, hassan, hussain, fatime(ra) were both sahabis and ahl bait. the books that contain filth against them. what is the opinion of yours on them. answer fairly.
There is no doubt of being their, as Sahabah [R.A] and Ahle Bayt [R.A]. Any such narration which speaks ill regarding them, is liable to be trashed without any discussion. Their integrity is much much higher than any such filthy narrations.

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if any scholar in his writings expresses his deficit of love of sahaba and ahl bait. what is your opinion on him. answer fairly.
Refer to the above, same question, same answer.

Now, let make things simple and clear. Are you a Shia or Ahle Sunnah? What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias, lets get things straight before any further.

And when it is said unto them (Kuffars): Believe as these people [Sahabah {R.A}] believe; they say: "Shall we believe as these foolish believe? Alert! they (Kuffars) are the foolish but they know not. {Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah#13}


222 Urdu Books on Shia - ردِ شیعہ پر 222 اردو کتابیں


#31 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 06:57 PM

View PostJhangvi, on 02 July 2011 - 06:22 PM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if sibt ibn jauzi becomes a rafidi by quoting some exaggerations you claim. then wat is your opinion on imam bukhari, imam nmuslim, imam nisai, etc the masters of hadith who directly reported traditions from rafidis. please answer fairly.
First of all let be very clear that there is a huge difference between mentioning some exaggerations and mentioning Shia filth. Exaggerations if remain within the limits, can be debatable; but when such so-called exaggerations go beyond with the Shia belief, are certainly not even worthy enough to talk about. So, open your eyes, read carefully and understand what filth Sibt Ibne Jawzi has spoken in his book. The reference for, I have already quoted in my last post.

Secondly you are so keen to ask the status of our Muhaditheen, that why is so, they have quoted few of the Ahadith in their books containing Shia narrators? Well, I believe you are from sub-continent Indo-Pak and I am pretty sure you must be knowing Urdu language; the answer to the same query has already been answered by one of our respected forum member Hot Ice in a thread. I'm quoting here for your question, and if let suppose you not understand, let me know I will translate the same in English.

View PostHot Ice, on 22 May 2011 - 08:26 PM, said:

Actually hamare taqreban tamam Ahl-e-Sunnat mohadiseen is bat pe mutafiq hain ke kisi riwayat mai agar koi Shia ravi aa jye to usay yaksar reject nahi kya jye ga balke us riwayat ko qubool karne se pehle kuch usooli baton ka khyal rakhna zaroori hai. Waise to usool-e-hadees mai is mozu pe mohadiseen ki taweel behes aur jarah mojood hai laikin tamam bhaion aur behno ki asani aur unke ilm ke lye is ka khulasa bata deta hoon.

Mohadiseen ne Ahl-e-Sunnat ke tareeq ki kisi riwayat mai Shia ravi ke mojood hone per us riwayat ko radd (reject) karne ya qubool karne ki teen (3) sharait bayan ki hain. Kuch ne in 3 sharait ke zail mai kuch khas batain bhi bayan ki hain laikin majority ne jo 3 ahm sharait per itefaq kia hai wo ye hain:-

1. Awal to us ravi ka siqa (sacha/sudooq) hona lazmi hai. Agar wo ravi siqa na ho aur na hi us ke siqa hone ki koi shahadat mojood ho to phir usay wahen radd (reject) kar dya jye ga. Laikin agar to ravi siqa hai aur us ke siqa hone ka saboot ya shahadat bhi mojood hai to phir is bat ki bunyad pe point # 2 aur point # 3 ko daikha jye ga.

Lehaza mandrja zail ye do points ( # 2 aur # 3 ) us ravi ke siqa hone ke sath mashroot hain:-

2. Agar wo ravi Ahl-e-Biddat mai se ho (kharji ho, rafzi ho, murjaa ho, nasabi ho, mutazili ho, qaddria ho) aur us ka aqeda ya biddat agar ghulu pe mabni ho yani sabb-o-shitam pe ya ghalez ya sakht ho to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar us ka aqeda ya biddat ghulu pe mabni na ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

3. Agar wo ravi apne aqeday (point # 1) ka daee (dawat dene wala) hai ya munazir (munazra kar ke apne aqeday ki taraf qail karne wala) hai to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar wo daee na ho aur na hi munazir ho aur agar us ki bayan karda riwayat se us ke mazhab ko taqwiat na pohnchti ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

Ye yad rahe ke point # 2 aur # 3 siqa hone ki shart ke sath hain aur in dono points ko aik sath daikha jye ga. Ye nahi ke siqa hone ke sath sirf wo point # 2 ki shart pe pura utarta hai ya point # 3 ki shart pe. Point # 2 aur # 3 ko aik sath daikha jye ga laikin us ke lye shart siqa hona lazmi hai.
Hope it will suffice you  :InshaAllah:

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

secondly, what is your opinion about the historians, muhaddiths and scholars who published in their books the incidents that blot the character of prophet(saw) like the incident of bani quraizah, the satanic verses incident. please answer fairly.
Present us here any such incident with Sahih chain, we would love to answer such  :InshaAllah: But mind you, the incident must be with complete and Sahih chain, we don't treat jokes!

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

ali, hassan, hussain, fatime(ra) were both sahabis and ahl bait. the books that contain filth against them. what is the opinion of yours on them. answer fairly.
There is no doubt of being their, as Sahabah [R.A] and Ahle Bayt [R.A]. Any such narration which speaks ill regarding them, is liable to be trashed without any discussion. Their integrity is much much higher than any such filthy narrations.

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if any scholar in his writings expresses his deficit of love of sahaba and ahl bait. what is your opinion on him. answer fairly.
Refer to the above, same question, same answer.

Now, let make things simple and clear. Are you a Shia or Ahle Sunnah? What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias, lets get things straight before any further.
it was pleasing to check your post. well, brother i am NOT A SHIA. without saying anything, i implore you to check my posts and see fer urself if i posted any shia filth.

#32 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:25 PM

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 06:57 PM, said:

View PostJhangvi, on 02 July 2011 - 06:22 PM, said:

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if sibt ibn jauzi becomes a rafidi by quoting some exaggerations you claim. then wat is your opinion on imam bukhari, imam nmuslim, imam nisai, etc the masters of hadith who directly reported traditions from rafidis. please answer fairly.
First of all let be very clear that there is a huge difference between mentioning some exaggerations and mentioning Shia filth. Exaggerations if remain within the limits, can be debatable; but when such so-called exaggerations go beyond with the Shia belief, are certainly not even worthy enough to talk about. So, open your eyes, read carefully and understand what filth Sibt Ibne Jawzi has spoken in his book. The reference for, I have already quoted in my last post.

Secondly you are so keen to ask the status of our Muhaditheen, that why is so, they have quoted few of the Ahadith in their books containing Shia narrators? Well, I believe you are from sub-continent Indo-Pak and I am pretty sure you must be knowing Urdu language; the answer to the same query has already been answered by one of our respected forum member Hot Ice in a thread. I'm quoting here for your question, and if let suppose you not understand, let me know I will translate the same in English.

View PostHot Ice, on 22 May 2011 - 08:26 PM, said:

Actually hamare taqreban tamam Ahl-e-Sunnat mohadiseen is bat pe mutafiq hain ke kisi riwayat mai agar koi Shia ravi aa jye to usay yaksar reject nahi kya jye ga balke us riwayat ko qubool karne se pehle kuch usooli baton ka khyal rakhna zaroori hai. Waise to usool-e-hadees mai is mozu pe mohadiseen ki taweel behes aur jarah mojood hai laikin tamam bhaion aur behno ki asani aur unke ilm ke lye is ka khulasa bata deta hoon.

Mohadiseen ne Ahl-e-Sunnat ke tareeq ki kisi riwayat mai Shia ravi ke mojood hone per us riwayat ko radd (reject) karne ya qubool karne ki teen (3) sharait bayan ki hain. Kuch ne in 3 sharait ke zail mai kuch khas batain bhi bayan ki hain laikin majority ne jo 3 ahm sharait per itefaq kia hai wo ye hain:-

1. Awal to us ravi ka siqa (sacha/sudooq) hona lazmi hai. Agar wo ravi siqa na ho aur na hi us ke siqa hone ki koi shahadat mojood ho to phir usay wahen radd (reject) kar dya jye ga. Laikin agar to ravi siqa hai aur us ke siqa hone ka saboot ya shahadat bhi mojood hai to phir is bat ki bunyad pe point # 2 aur point # 3 ko daikha jye ga.

Lehaza mandrja zail ye do points ( # 2 aur # 3 ) us ravi ke siqa hone ke sath mashroot hain:-

2. Agar wo ravi Ahl-e-Biddat mai se ho (kharji ho, rafzi ho, murjaa ho, nasabi ho, mutazili ho, qaddria ho) aur us ka aqeda ya biddat agar ghulu pe mabni ho yani sabb-o-shitam pe ya ghalez ya sakht ho to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar us ka aqeda ya biddat ghulu pe mabni na ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

3. Agar wo ravi apne aqeday (point # 1) ka daee (dawat dene wala) hai ya munazir (munazra kar ke apne aqeday ki taraf qail karne wala) hai to aise ravi ki riwayat ko qubool nahi kia jye ga. Laikin agar wo daee na ho aur na hi munazir ho aur agar us ki bayan karda riwayat se us ke mazhab ko taqwiat na pohnchti ho to phir qubool ki jye gi.

Ye yad rahe ke point # 2 aur # 3 siqa hone ki shart ke sath hain aur in dono points ko aik sath daikha jye ga. Ye nahi ke siqa hone ke sath sirf wo point # 2 ki shart pe pura utarta hai ya point # 3 ki shart pe. Point # 2 aur # 3 ko aik sath daikha jye ga laikin us ke lye shart siqa hona lazmi hai.
Hope it will suffice you  :InshaAllah:

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

secondly, what is your opinion about the historians, muhaddiths and scholars who published in their books the incidents that blot the character of prophet(saw) like the incident of bani quraizah, the satanic verses incident. please answer fairly.
Present us here any such incident with Sahih chain, we would love to answer such  :InshaAllah: But mind you, the incident must be with complete and Sahih chain, we don't treat jokes!

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

ali, hassan, hussain, fatime(ra) were both sahabis and ahl bait. the books that contain filth against them. what is the opinion of yours on them. answer fairly.
There is no doubt of being their, as Sahabah [R.A] and Ahle Bayt [R.A]. Any such narration which speaks ill regarding them, is liable to be trashed without any discussion. Their integrity is much much higher than any such filthy narrations.

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:

if any scholar in his writings expresses his deficit of love of sahaba and ahl bait. what is your opinion on him. answer fairly.
Refer to the above, same question, same answer.

Now, let make things simple and clear. Are you a Shia or Ahle Sunnah? What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias, lets get things straight before any further.
it was pleasing to check your post. well, brother i am NOT A SHIA. without saying anything, i implore you to check my posts and see fer urself if i posted any shia filth.


The Prophet said that the best man amongst his followers is the one
who has the greatest number of wives. [Bukhari, Vol 3:52 Book of
Nikah #62] The Quran (49:13) tells us that the best person is the one
who is best in conduct.



The sun rises between the two antlers of Satan. [Beginning of
Creation 2:235 #504] Does this need a comment?

Prophet Abraham lied three times. [Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:57 #78]


When the Prophet married Ayesha, she was 6 years old, and the
marriage was consummated when she was 9 (and he was 54).
[Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:75 #122] On the other hand, the Quran ties
marriage to adulthood and mental maturity by declaring marriage a
solemn covenant (4:21). There is strong historical evidence contrary
to Bukhari


Run from the leper as you run from the lion. [Bukhari, Kitab-ut-Tibb,
Book of Medicine 3:259 #663] It is well-known that leprosy requires
years of close contact to get transmitted. Still, we find contradiction in
several Ahadith. For example, La ‘Udwa wa La Teeara wa La
Haamma (There is no such thing as contagion, omen or a hunger
snake in the stomach.)


The exalted Prophet said, “I will be the first one to regain
consciousness in Qiyamat (Resurrection), but I will find Prophet
Moses holding the foot of the Throne of God. [Hadith 1750 Kitab-ut-
Tafseer Vol 2 pg 784] This Hadith has obviously been contrived by
some non-Muslim to belittle Muhammad (S) in comparison to Prophet
Moses.

One of the greatest names of the Islamic world of the 20th century ,
the Chief Saudi Cleric, Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Baaz, issued a Fatwa in
1970: Whoever believes that the Earth moves around the Sun, or that
man has landed on the Moon is an ardent Kaafir. Furthermore,
anyone doubting his infidelity would be a greater Kaafir and his wife
would be automatically divorced from him. It would be haram to marry
into his family, drink water in his house, pray behind him, or to attend
his funeral prayer. This Fatwa (edict) was sponsored and publicized
by the Saudi government. Amusingly, this is a prototype of the kind of
Fatawa dispensed by our Mullahs rendering Kaafir whoever won’t
heed them.

During labor pains let the woman hold the book “Mawatta Imam
Malik” for instant delivery. (Thanwi, A’maal-e-Qurani)


Imam Abu Suleman Jozjani told Muhammad bin Sa’d: I was
in the company of Imam Malik. Imam Malik was asked, “Can a man
have rectal intercourse with his wives?” Malik struck his head with his
hand and replied, “O Dummies! I am coming directly from bath after
doing that. Don’t you read in the Quran that your wives are your
fields, go into them as you please?” (‘Amdatil Qari, Tafsir Bukhari).
The Quran here means: When socializing with women (not wives) it
should be kept in mind that they are the custodians of your future
generations. (See verse 2:223 above).

now see imam ghazali's iyha ul uloom

Cattle meat is disease and its milk is cure. (2:36). The Quran must
have forbidden cattle for consumption, then.

The Prophet said that a piece of rug lying in a corner of the house is
better than a woman who is infertile. (2:48)


A Hadith says a dark woman who bears children is better than a
beautiful woman who bears no children. (2:49).


On (2:52) Ghazali goes on to say, “When a man’s organ is in
erection, two thirds of his mind and two thirds of his religion have
departed from him.” This is the wisdom of our “Hujjatul Islam”, The
Testimony of Islam, an honorable title given to Ghazali!



Hazrat Umar Farooq used to break his fast (not by eating or drinking),
but by having sexual intercourse. During Ramadhan he used to have
intercourse with three concubines before Salat-il-Isha (the night
prayers). (2:54)
Imam Hasan used to divorce four women and marry four women at
the same hour. He married more than 200 wives. That is why the
Prophet has said, “Hasan is from me.” (2:55). According to the Prophet (S) the most undesirable among permissible acts is divorce




Find a woman who is beautiful, well mannered, has big black eyes
and black hair, and a white complexion. (2:73). This is probably
Ghazali’s dream girl that he could never attract.


The Prophet said, "The best wives are those who look beautiful and
their mehr (marital portions or gift) is small." (2:74). The exalted
Prophet had advised character as the first and foremost criterion in
the selection of a spouse.


Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq used to carry pebbles in his mouth so that he
would not speak. (Pg 505). Hazrat Abu Bakr was the noblest
ruler/caliph of the Islamic Empire. Someone should have put pebbles
in Ghazali’s mouth.

check now ibn tamiyah:-
Minhaj al-Sunnah, Volume 4 page 137:




“Aliintended to marry so as to hurt her (Fatima) on purpose.”



i could go on with some narrations that are too terrible to post. hope these will do.

#33 OFFLINE   Jhangvi

Jhangvi

    Technical Admin

  • Admin
  • Topics: 357
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Thanked: 725 times
  • Joined: 27-November 04
  • Local time: 05:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 07:55 PM

It's worthless to answer the copy pasters.

You skipped the question:
What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias 12th Imam.

And when it is said unto them (Kuffars): Believe as these people [Sahabah {R.A}] believe; they say: "Shall we believe as these foolish believe? Alert! they (Kuffars) are the foolish but they know not. {Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah#13}


222 Urdu Books on Shia - ردِ شیعہ پر 222 اردو کتابیں


#34 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 08:18 PM

View PostJhangvi, on 02 July 2011 - 07:55 PM, said:

It's worthless to answer the copy pasters.

You skipped the question:
What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias 12th Imam.

regarding the shia twelth imam i belive wat ahl sunnah says that he died and the mehdi is different from the twelth imam of shias. but the mahdi will be from the progeny of ali.

#35 OFFLINE   Jhangvi

Jhangvi

    Technical Admin

  • Admin
  • Topics: 357
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Thanked: 725 times
  • Joined: 27-November 04
  • Local time: 05:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 08:43 PM

I haven't asked you the Ahle Sunnah view; what I have asked is your view regarding Shias 12th Imam whom they say as Imam-e-Zamana (Qaim Aal-e-Muhammad) as per Shia belief.

And when it is said unto them (Kuffars): Believe as these people [Sahabah {R.A}] believe; they say: "Shall we believe as these foolish believe? Alert! they (Kuffars) are the foolish but they know not. {Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah#13}


222 Urdu Books on Shia - ردِ شیعہ پر 222 اردو کتابیں


#36 OFFLINE   omarashidwani

omarashidwani

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • Topics: 9
  • Posts: 100
  • Thanked: 0 times
  • Joined: 22-December 10
  • Local time: 06:30 AM
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion:Shiaism

Posted 02 July 2011 - 09:05 PM

View PostJhangvi, on 02 July 2011 - 07:55 PM, said:

It's worthless to answer the copy pasters.

You skipped the question:
What do you believe regarding Shias 12th Imam? Please enlight your answer keeping in view the belief of Shias 12th Imam.

wat is ur opinion now on ghazali, imam bukhari, ibn tamiyah.....? like sibt ibn jauzi??

#37 OFFLINE   Jhangvi

Jhangvi

    Technical Admin

  • Admin
  • Topics: 357
  • Posts: 3,448
  • Thanked: 725 times
  • Joined: 27-November 04
  • Local time: 05:30 PM
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California
  • Religion:Islam (Sunni)

Posted 02 July 2011 - 09:41 PM

View Postomarashidwani, on 02 July 2011 - 09:05 PM, said:

wat is ur opinion now on ghazali, imam bukhari, ibn tamiyah.....? like sibt ibn jauzi??
omarashidwani, at last you are caught!

Attention: To all forum members!

This chap omarashidwani is a Shia! 100% Shia under Taqiyyah! For details, please check the following web pages where he recommends the Shia Wadhaif (Wazeefa) and praises his religion-mate Shia shmeem.

- http://shmeem.multiply.com
- http://nazmin1.multiply.com
- http://mahnoor5.multiply.com
- http://afshia286.multiply.com
- http://shimakhan.multiply.com
- http://mohammedarahan.multiply.com
- http://mrhussaini.multiply.com
- http://sobia1929.multiply.com

Furthermore, he's listed at:

- http://www.scribd.co...of-Imam-Hussain

And lastly, listed on with following comments:

- http://shmeem.multip...estbook?&page=3

Quote

shameem bhai,
u r doing a wonderful job. helping others is a duty of every muslim. let me also share some wazaif with you. mail me at omarashidwani@gmail.com
ya ghazi Abbas (ra)

Admin's Note:

The Shia member omarashidwani is on a mission to spam the forum and continuously violating Forum Rules. Topic closed


P.S: omarashidwani this is your last warning, next you will be banned.

And when it is said unto them (Kuffars): Believe as these people [Sahabah {R.A}] believe; they say: "Shall we believe as these foolish believe? Alert! they (Kuffars) are the foolish but they know not. {Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah#13}


222 Urdu Books on Shia - ردِ شیعہ پر 222 اردو کتابیں






Similar Topics Collapse

  Topic Forum Started By Stats Last Post Info

1 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Welcome to HCY Forum
Please Login or Register to use full features.