[Fatah-Momin]

Al-Jazaeri, in his book Al-Anwar Al-Numania p.360-362 said that after Ali collected Quran, he brought it to Caliphs and said to them:"This is the book of Allah as revealed. So Umar Ibn Al-Khattab said to him: We have no need of you nor your Quran. We have a Quran writted by Usman. So Ali said to them: "You will not see it after this day , and none will see until my son the Mehdi emerges." In that Quran are many additions and it is free from alteration......"

 002.jpg (54.85K)
Number of downloads: 0

 003.jpg (110.29K)
Number of downloads: 0

[Fatah-Momin]

Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 - Published Iran]

Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 - Published Iran]

Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 - Published Iran]

Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]

“ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]

Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]

After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]

To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]


The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]

[Fatah-Momin]

"The Quran collected after the prophet is not the correct quran" Hazaar Tumhari dus Hamari Page # 560 by Abdul Karim Mushtaq, Karachi.

"Munafiqeen deleted lot of stuff from Quran" Ehtijaj-e-Tabri vol 1 page# 382 Printed in Qom

" Shia only reciet the present Quran as Imam said to wait for the actual Quran to be brought by Imam Mahdi" Anwaar Ul Naumania Vol. 2 page # 343/344

[Fatah-Momin]

4 أبوعلي الاشعري، عن محمد بن عبدالجبار، عن صفوان، عن إسحاق بن عمار، عن أبي بصير، عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) قال: نزل القرآن أربعة أرباع: ربع فينا وربع في عدونا وربع سنن وأمثال وربع فرائض وأحكام (1).

CODE

http://www.alhikmeh.com/arabic/mktba/hadith/alkafi02/21.htm

It was narrated from Abu Jafar: "Quran was revealed in parts. Quarter is with us, other with our enemies, quarter is sunna with "amthaalu", and in (last) quarter are duties and judgements" (see "Al Kafi" 2/628/4)
(Also see "Bihar al anwar" Maclisi 89/74)
وقال عليه السلام: نزل القرآن أربعة أرباع: ربع فينا، وربع في عدونا، وربع قصص وأمثال، وربع قضايا وأحكام،

CODE

http://shiabooks.info/books/htm1/m013/13/no1368.html

(Also see "Al Vafi" p 256, from Abu Jafar)
عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام، قال: نزل القرآن أربعة أرباع: ربع فينا، وربع في عدونا، وربع سنن وأمثال، وربع فرائض وأحكام

CODE

http://shiabooks.info/books/htm1/m018/22/no2213.html

[Fatah-Momin]

Quran is Fitna

[ 25356 ] 2 ـ وعن عدة من أصحابنا ، عن سهل بن زياد ، عن علي بن اسباط ، عن عمه يعقوب بن سالم رفعه ، قال : قال أمير المؤمنين ( عليه السلام ) : لا تعلموا نساءكم سورة يوسف ولا تقرؤوهن اياها فإنّ فيها الفتن وعلّموهنّ سورة النور فانّ فيها المواعظ .

CODE

http://www.rafed.net/books/hadith/wasael-20/v09.html

Allama Hurr Amili narrated in his book "Wasael" vol 20/177: "Amirul-Mu'mineen sayd :Don't you teach your women Surat Yousuf, nor read it to them, for in it are Fitan (plural of Fitnah), rather teach them Surat al-Nur, for in it are exhortations."
Also see "Tafsir As Safi" 3/57
وفي الكافي عن أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام لا تعلموا نساءكم سورة يوسف عليه السلام ولا تقرؤهن إياها فإن فيها الفتن وعلموهن سورة النور فإن فيها المواعظ

CODE

http://www.rafed.net/books/olom-quran/al-safi-03/03.html

First and the most important from this narration: SURA FROM QURAN IS FITNA

[Fatah-Momin]

Shia Belief

One important remark, here, is that, we cannot call any person (Shi'a
or Sunni) who claims Quran is incomplete, as Kafir. This is simply
because believing in the completeness of Quran is not an article of
faith, nor do we have any tradition saying that anyone who claims
Quran is incomplete, is a Kafir. Also, the verse of Quran that states
that Allah is the protector of the Reminder, can be interpreted
differently. (Logically we cannot prove the lack of alteration in
Quran by Quran!)

CODE

http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter8/5.html

[Fatah-Momin]

Quran Is corrupted Shia belief

 majlisiquran.jpg (54.79K)
Number of downloads: 0

Mullah Baqir Majlasi:" and traditions from the ways of the elite (i.e Shia) and the public (i.e Sunnah) regarding omission and change are numerous (mutawatir), and logic dectates that if the Quran was seperated and spread amongst people, then if a fallible has tried to collect it, then it is highly unlikely that its collection would be complete and in compliance with reality. However, there is no doubt that people are obliged to work with what is included in the Mushafs and to read it until Al-Qayem appears, and this is known through numersous traditions (mutawatir) from the way of Ahlul Bayt and most traditions relating to this topic point to omission and change, and many of it will be related in the chapters..........."
 majlisiquran0.jpg (47.34K)
Number of downloads: 0

" This tradition is authentic and it cannot be hidden that this traditon and many more authentic traditons are explicit in (saying) that the Quran is missing and has changed. For me, (I believe) that the traditions have reached tawatur (i.e they are numerous) with regards to the meaning, and ignoring all of it would mean ignoring all traditions accordingly , but I think that the narrations in this meaning are not less than the narrations if Imamah so how do they confirm it using traditions?" Mirat Al-Uqool Vol 12 p. 525

 majlisiquran1.jpg (15.57K)
Number of downloads: 0

This post has been edited by Fatah-Momin: 15 March 2009 - 11:08 PM

[Fatah-Momin]

Brother this is a book "Mafatih Al Jinna" by Abbas Qummi. Page 72.
In footnote he wrote: "Allama Majlisi said : Revelation of ayat Al-Kursi according to the narration of Ali Bin Ibrahim (Al Qummi) and Kulaini is:
Allah! La Ilaha Illa Huwa, the Ever Living, the One who sustains and protects all that exists. Neither slumber, nor sleep overtake Him. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on earth. Who is he that can intercede with Him except with His Permission? He knows what happens to them in this world, and what will happen to them in the Hereafter and that which is inbetween them and that which is under the soil., the knower of all that which is hidden and that which is manifest, the most Beneficent, the most Merciful. And they will never compass anything of His Knowledge except that which He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and He feels no fatigue in guarding and preserving them. And He is the Most High, the Most Great...(till)..they will abide therein forever".
Here on-line
(قال العلامة المجلسي: آية الكرسي على التنزيل على رواية عليّ بن ابراهيم والكليني هي كما يلي: الله لا اله إلاّ هو الحيّ القيوم لا تأخذه سنة ولا نوم له ما في السماوات والارض وما بينهما وما تحت الثرى عالم الغيب والشهادة الرحمن الرحيم من ذا الذي ... الى هم فيها خالدون).

CODE

http://www.aljaafaria.com/Mafatih/meftah02.htm
By the way the same think in the footnote of book "Sahifatul bihar" by Abbas Qummi.
http://img100.imageshack.us/my.php?image=412rz.jpg

 QURANSHIA0.jpg (35.35K)
Number of downloads: 0

 QURANSHIA.jpg (43.91K)
Number of downloads: 0

[Fatah-Momin]

That is book "Ayatul nash va mansuh fi Quran" compilied from narrations of Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ibrahim Numani. Author is Ali ibn Husayn ibn Musa Shariful Murtada.
I could translate only sentence in red (there is no dictionary near me)
"There is no antagonisms between muslims that there are corruptions, like omission and addition of letters in the Quran"
(If anyone will do translation better, that will be fine)

 QURAN01.jpg (33.91K)
Number of downloads: 0

 QURAN02.jpg (32.02K)
Number of downloads: 0

[Fatah-Momin]

Al-Jazaeri, in his book Al-Anwar Al-Numania p.360-362 said: " It has been known through numerous narrations that the Quran as revealed was only collated by Ameer-ul-Momineen -ahs- based on the will of the Prophet -SAW-, for he remained after his death for six months busy compiling it , so when he compiled it as was revealed he took it to those who made themselves Caliphs after the Messenger of Allah -SAW- and said to them: this is the book of Allah as revealed. So Umar Ibn Al-Khattab said to him: We have no need of you nor your Quran. We have a Quran writted by Umar. So Ali said to them: "you will not see it after this day , and none will see until my son the Mehdi emerges."

In that Quran are many additions and it is free from alteration, for Uthman was one of the scribes of Revelation because of a benefit that he -SAW- perceived, which is that they would not consider him untruthful with regards to the Quran by saying that it is fabricated and that the Spirit of Truth did not descend with it as was said by their predecessors, rather they even said it. And as such, he also made Muawiya one of the scribes, six months before his death, for the same benefit, even though Uthman and his likes only attended in the Masjid with the general public , so they only wrote what Jibril -ahs- descended with. As for what he brought with him inside his house -SAW- it was only written by Ameer-ul-Momineen, because he has the right to enter and exit , so he alone was the one to write such revelation.

As for this Quran which is present today in the hands of people it was written in Uthman's handwriting , and they called it the Imam, and burned all others and concealed them, and sent it during the time when he made himself Caliph to all areas and regions, and thus you see that the rules of writing it are contradicting the rules of writing the Arabic language.

And Umar Ibn Al-Khattab has summoned Ali -ahs- during the time he made himself Caliph, asking him to bring the original Quran which he compilled. And he knew that he asked for it to burn it, as was done with the Quran of Ibn Masud, or to conceal it with him so that people would say: Quran is the the Book written by Uthman and none other, so he did not send it to him , and it is right now with Mawlana Al-Mehdi -ahs- along with other Holy Scripture and Prophetic heritage.

When Ameer-ul-Momineen took the reign of Khilafa he was not able to bring forward that Quran and conceal this one , because by doing so he will reveal the ugliness of those preceding him, just as he was not able to refrain from Saltul Dhuha, and just he was not able to perform the two Muta'as: the Muta'a of Hajj and the Muta'a of women.

The Quran which Uthman wrote remained until it fell in the hands of the Qura' (readers of Quran) so they altered it by Mad', Idhgam, and iltiqa' Al-Sakinayn (i.e the rules of Tajweed) just as Uthman and his companions altered it some of the verses in such way that common sense rejects and that brain dictates that it was not revealed as such."

On page 336 of the said book, Al-Jazaeri says: " And if you ask how has it become permissible to read this Quran the way it is even though it has been altered? I would say: It has been narrated in reports that they - Alyim Assalam- (i.e the infallible Imams) ordered their Shia to read what is available from the Quran in prayer and other (acts of worship) and do abide by its rulings until the emergence of Mawlana Sahib-ul-Zaman so this Quran that is present in the hands of people would be raised and the Quran which was compilled by Ameer-ul-Momineen would come out so it would be read and it's commandments practiced"

Al-Tabarsi narrates from Abu Thar -Raa- in his book Al-Ihtijaj p.155: " When the Messenger of Allah -SAW- died , Ali -ahs- compiled the Quran and brough it to the Muhajirs and Ansar and showed it to them, because the Messenger of Allah -SAW- ordered him to do so, so when Abu Bakr opened it , there appeared the scandals of the people on the first page, so Umar jumped and said: O Ali! take it back for we have no need of it. So Ali -ahs- took it back and departed. Then they brought Zayd Ibn Thabit, and he was a reader of the Quran, so Umar said to him: Ali has brought to us and it contains the scandals of the Muhajirs and Ansars, so we have decided that you would compile the Quran and that we would omit every scandal mentioned therein.

So Zayd answered his request. And when Umar became Caliph he requested Ali to give them the Quran so that they may altered amongst themselves"

He also said: " Do not be surprised of the many fabricated traditions , for after the Prophet (pbuh) they have changed and altered in this religion what is greater than this such as their changing of the Quran , and displacing it words and omitting what is mentioned in it of the praises for Al-e-Rasool and the pure Imams, and the scandals of the Munafiqs and showing their evil as will be mention in Noor Al-Quran " abid Vol1 p.97

When Al-Mufid was asked the following question:

Q: What is your opinion about the Quran. Is it what is included between the two covers in the hands of people, or was some of what Allah revealed to his Prophet get lost? And is it what Ameer-ul-Momineen -ahs- has compiled or is it what Uthman has compiled as those who differ with us claim?

He replied in Masael Surooriya (p.78-81):

All of what is between the two covers of the Quran is the Speech of Allah -tala- and His revelation, it does not contain any sayings of human beings, and it is most of what has been revealed, and the rest of what Allah -tala- has revealed as Quran is bestowed with the preserver of Sharia and custodian of (Islamic) rulings, none of it is omitted, even though the one who has compiled what is between the two covers, as present today (i.e Uthman -Raa- ), did not include this in the compilation due to reasons such as: his shortcomings in knowing some , what he had doubts about, and some which he included and others he meant to exclude, while Ameer-ul-Momineen compiled the revealed Quran from beginning to end, and collated it as it is supposed to be collated: so he put the Makki (ayas) before Madani , and abrogated verses before those abrogating them, and put all of it as it is required to be put, and for this reason Jafar Ibn Muhammad Al-Saddiq said: " By Allah if the Quran was read as it was revealed you would have found our names as those before us were named"

Al-Mufid further said: " Authentic traditions have passed from our Imams -Alyhim Assalam- that they have ordered (us) to read what is between the two covers , and that we do not resort to any other , by it in addition or subtraction until the Qayem emerges and he would read to people the Quran as Allah -tala- revealed it and as collected by Ameer-ul-Momineen and they forbade us from reading what is mentioned in traditions of words that are in excess of what is established in the Mus-haf because it did not come through mutawatir (narrations), but through individual (narrations) , and a person can commit mistakes in conveying it , and whenver a person reads what is contrary to what is in the two covers he will make himself prone to (the attacks) of those who differ with us , and to the mighty (rulers) and thus he would expose himself to perishing. Thus, they -Alyhim Assalam- prevented us from reading the Quran contrary to what is mentioned between the two covers"

Al-Mufid also said: " Ample traditions have been reported of the Imams of Guidance from Al-e-Muhammad that the Quran has changed and that some of the transgressors have altered it by deleting and omitting" Fasl Al-Khitab p.30

He also said: "All of what is between the two covers of the Quran is the Speech of Allah and His Revelation, it does not contain any of the people's sayings, and it is most of what has been revealed and the rest of what Allah has revealed as Quran is with the custodian of Shariah, the guardian of the rulings, none is lost from it. Even though he (i.e Uthman) did not include it in what has been compiled between the two covers (as is present) today amongst the collection of what he gathered due to reasons that made due this, such as him not knowing some of it, due to doubts about some of it, and some he left out and removed on purpose, and Ameer-ul-Momineen has collected the Quran from its begginning till its end , and collected it as it is supposed to be collected" abid


Al-Amili said in the introduction to the tafseer: Mira'at Al-Anwar wa Mishkat Al-Asrar p.36 : " You should know that the unavoidable truth as established through the following mutawatir narrations that this Quran which is in our hands has been subject to some alterations after the Prophet -SAW- , and those who compiled it have dropped many of the words and verses, and that the preserved Quran which is free from what is just mentioned and which is the same as what Allah -tala- Has revealed is what Ali -ahs- has compiled and preserved till it reached his son Al-Hassan -ahs- and so on till it reached Al-Qayem -ahs- and today it is with him "

He also said: " As for me that truth of this saying is clear after following the traditions and investigating the narrations such that it can be ruled that it is one of the essentials of the Shia Madhab and that it is one of the great corruptions arising from usurping the khilafah, so consider (this)" abid p. 49 (Compare this to fatwas that Angel quoted which states that belief that Quran is preserved is NOT one of the essentials of the Shia Madhab!!)

Al-Kulayni narrated from Jabir: I heard Abu Jafar say: " Whoever claims that he has compiled all of the Quran as revealed is a liar. It has only been compiled and preserved as Allah -tala- revealed by Ali Ibn Abi Taib and the Imams after him -alyhim Assalam-" (Usool Al-Kafi Vol 1 p.284, Basaer Al-Darajat p.213)

Haj Kareem Al-Kirmani in Irshad Al-Awad (p.221) said: " After emerging, Imam Mehdi would recite the Quran and say: O Muslims , by Allah, this is the real Quran that Allah -tala- has revealed to Muhammad"

Al-Kashani said in Hidayat Al-Talibeen p.368: " Utham ordered Zayd ibn Thabit, who was his friend and an enemy of Ali, to collect the Quran and omit the merits of Ahlul Bayt and the disparagment of their enemies, and the Quran which is present today in the hands of people and which is known as Mushaf Uthman is the same Quran that Uthman ordered to be compiled"

He also said in his Tafseer said after relating the traditions that show that the Quran has been altered: " What is acknowledged by all of these traditions and other narrations from the way of Ahlul Bayt is that the Quran which we have today is NOT as complete as has been revealed to Muhammad (pbuh) but some of it is contrary to what has been revealed , and some of it is changed and many things have been omitted from it such as the name of Ali in many places and some other things, and it is not in the order that is acceptable to Allah and His Messenger" [Tafseer Al-Safi Vol 1 p.49]

He also said: " Just as there has been motives for the believers to relate the Quran and preserve it, also there have been motives for it to be changed at the hands of the Munafiqs who changed the Wasiyah and altered the Khilafah because it contains what contradicts their view and desires. Alteration to it (i,e Quran), if it occured, then it only occured before being spread in the counrties and fixed as it is today" abid Vol 1 p. 54

And then he refuted this view by saying that if it was true we cannot depend on anything in the Quran , because all of it would be prone to alteration and contradicting what Allah has revealed. Then there would be no proof in the Quran for anyting and no use of following it and no meaning to the order to uphold to it.

Regarding the narration of Hisham Ibn Salim from Al-Sadiq: the Quran that Jibril brought to Muhammad (pbuh) is 17.000 verses. Al-Majlisi said: " This tradition is authentic and it cannot be hidden that this traditon and many more authentic traditons are explicit in (saying) that the Quran is missing and has changed. For me, (I believe) that the traditions have reached tawatur (i.e they are numerous) with regards to the meaning, and ignoring all of it would mean ignoring all traditions accordingly , but I think that the narrations in this meaning are not less than the narrations if Imamah so how do they confirm it using traditions?" Fasl Al-Khitab p.353 Mirat Al-Uqool Vol 12 p. 525

He also said: " Uthman has deleted three things: The virtues of Ali and his Ahl-e-Bayt, the dispraising of Quraish, the dispraising of the three Caliphs such as the verse: " Ah! woe is me! Would that I had never taken Abu Bakr for a friend!" Tathkirat Al-A'imah p.9

In this same book he listed the Surah of Wilayah which some 12er claims that Uthman -ra- has omitted from the Quran. It has also been mentioned in the Book Fasl Al-Khitab:

" O you who believe! Believe in the two lights who recite on you My verses and warn you the punishment of a great day. Two lights , they are from each other, and I am the All Hearing the All Knowing." and then: " Those who disbelieve after believeing by breaking their covenant and that which the Messenger have taken their pledge on will be casted in Hellfire. They have transgressed against themselves and disobeyed the Wasi of the Messenger, they will surely made to drink from boiling water" and then: " Ali is the of the God-fearing. We will fulfill his right on the Day of Judgment. We are not unaware of his oppression (i.e him being oppressed). Surely have we honoured him above all of your family. Him and his progeny are of the patient ones. Their enemies are the Imams of the evil-doers" and then: " We have brought the glad tidings by his pious progeny. They do not disobey our order. I bestow on them blessings from me, and Mercy while they are alive, while they are died and when they are resurrected. Those who come after you and oppress them , then on them is My wrath. They are people of evil , losers. And for those who follow them, I will bestow on them mercy and they will dwell secure in lofty halls. Praise be to Allah the Lord of the Worlds"


After rejecting the Sunni belief in the seven variant readings, Al-Bahrani said: What refutes their claim also is the numerous and ample traditions that the Quran is missing and (things) have been omitted from it which is the view of a group of our scholars both early and late" Al-Hadaiq Al-Nadhira Vol 8 p.10

In his commentary on the verse of Wudu and the Sunni reading "wa-arjulakum" indicating that feets are to be washed in wudu he said: It is not far-fetched to say that this (variant) reading, like other changes to the Glorious Quran since we affirm the changing and replacing both in addition and subtraction even though some of our fellow (Shia scholars) have claimed consensus in denying the former, but the traditions refute this (position) just as they have changed the saying of Allah -tala- in the verse of the Cave (i.e 9:40) to drive away disgrace from the Shiekh of the wicked ones (i.e Abu Bakr), for in our traditions it has been revealed as such: " then Allah sent down his peace upon His Messenger (i.e instead of upon him), and strengthened him with forces which ye saw not" so they omitted the phrase "His Messenger" and replaced it with the pronoun, and close to this , as has been mentioned by our scholars with regards to replacing, is placing the verse: " And Allah Only wishes to remove all abomination from you, ye Members of the Family, and to make you pure and spotless" amidst the (verses) addressing the wives" abid Vol 2. p289-90

Regarding the companions Al-khomeni said: " Their only concern was this world and to gain power rather than Islam and Quran. They took Quran as an excuse to acheive their corrupt intentions. It was easy for them to remove such verses from the Book of Allah (i.e verses indicating khilafah of Ali) and as such is the changing of the Heavenly Book, and distaning the Quran from the eyes of the world permanently, such that this would be a disgrace to Quran and Muslims till the Day of Judgment. The accusation of alteration that they direct towards Jews and Christians only applies to them" Kashf Al-Astar p.114

As is widely known, the principle that an Imaam has to be present at every point in time is central to the Shia faith. Among the Quraanic Verses that clearly refute this idea, we have:

[5:19] O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Now has come to you Our Messenger (Muhammad SAW) making (things) clear unto you, after a break in (the series of) Messengers, lest you say: "There came unto us no bringer of glad tidings and no warner." But now has come unto you a bringer of glad tidings and a warner. And Allah is Able to do all things.

The obvious thing any person can gather from this Verse is that Allah has sent Muhammad after a break in Messengers. Of course, this is very much accepted by all. However, the question becomes: If according to Shia ideology, an Infallible Imaam is supposed to be present at every point in time, then:

1. What is the big deal with there being a "break in Messengers", and why does Allah have to mention it ?

2. Again, why would the Jews and Christians be confused (clear from the phrase: lest you say: "There came unto us no bringer of glad tidings and no warner." ) without a Messenger, if it was their responsibility to recognize the proper Imaam of their time ?

Finally, in this respect, I would like to reiterate that the presence of an Imaam and his recognition is viewed as being more important in Shia circles than the presence of a Rasul/Nabi, then the existence of such Verses in the Quran is incomprehensible.

[Fatah-Momin]

May Allah Curse the People with such deviant beliefs.

الشيخ المفيد
واتفقت الإمامية على وجوب رجعة كثير من الأموات إلى الدنيا قبل يوم القيامة ، وإن كان بينهم في معنى الرجعة اختلاف ، واتفقوا على إطلاق لفظ البداء
في وصف لله تعالى ، وإن كان ذلك من جهة السمع دون القياس ، واتفقوا أن أئمة الضلال خالفوا في كثير من تأليف القرآن ، وعدلوا فيه عن موجب
- التنزيل وسنة النبي صلى اله عليه وسلم وأجمعت المعتزلة والخوارج والزيدية والمرجئة وأصحاب الحديث على خلاف الإمامية في جميع ما عددناه (أوائل المقالات ص 48
.(49
----------
.( إن الأخبار جاءت مستفيضة عن أئمة الهدى من آل محمد صلى اله عليه وسلم باختلاف القرآن وما أحدثه الظالمين فيه من زيادة من الحذف والنقصان (ص

In the first excerpt, Sheikh Mufid makes it clear that the Ahlus-Sunnah, the Mu'tazilah and the Khawarij opposed the Imamiyyah (shia) belief by believing in the correctness of the compilation of the Quran in its present form.

In the second excerpt, he asserts that the reports of the 'dhalims' (companions) changing the Quran are very elaborate, and mutawatir (hence cannot be rejected).

نعمة الله الجزائري
إن تسليم تواترها { القراءات السبع } عن الوحي الآلهي وكون الكل قد نزل به الروح الأمين يفضي إلى طرح الأخبار المستفيضة بل المتواترة الدالة بصريحها
على وقوع التحريف في القرآن كلاما ومادة وإعرابا، مع أن أصحابنا رضوان الله عليهم قد أطبقوا على صحتها والتصديق بها. نعم قد خالف فيها المرتضى
.(2/ والصدوق والشيخ الطبرسي وحكموا بأن ما بين دفتي المصحف هو القرآن المنزل لا غير ولم يقع فيه تحريف ولا تبديل (الأنوار النعمانية 357
----------
ولا تعجب من كثرة الأخبار الموضوعة فإنهم بعد النبي صلى اله عليه وسلم قد غيروا وبدلوا في الدين ما هو أعظم من هذا كتغييرهم القرآن وتحريف كلماته وحذف ما فيه
.(1/ من مدائح آل الرسول والأئمة الطاهرين وفضائح المنافقين وإظهار مساويهم كما سيأتي بيانه في نور القرآن (الأنوار النعمانية 97

In the first excerpt, Al-Jaza'iri states the same: that the reports of alteration in the Quran are mutawatir and hence correct. Moreover, he asserts that 'our companions' (e.g. Kulayni, Ali Al-Qummi and others) confirmed these reports and believed in them. Finally, he accepts that a handful of scholars did oppose the majority view of the shia. But they are, after all, the minority and the mutawatir reports go against their beliefs.
In the second report, he states that after the Prophet's death the companions changed the Quran's words, removed the praises of the ahlul-baytand the criticism of the munafiqeen (companions).


these are the disgusting beliefs of the rafidah.

[Fatah-Momin]

Here is some more shia filth.

الفيض الكاشاني
والمستفاد من هذه الأخبار وغيرها من الروايات من طريق أهل البيت عليهم السلام أن القرآن الذي بين أظهرنا ليس بتمامه كما أنزل على محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم بل منه
ماهو خلاف ما أنزل الله، ومنه ما هو مغير محرف، وأنه قد حذف منه أشياء كثيرة منها اسم علي عليه السلام، في كثير من المواضع، ومنها لفظة آل
محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم غير مرة، ومنها أسماء المنافقين في مواضعها، ومنها غير ذلك، وأنه ليس أيضا على الترتبيب المرضي عند الله، وعند رسول صلى اله عليه وسلم.
----------
واما اعتقاد مشايخنا في ذلك فالظاهر من ثقة الاسلام محمد بن يعقوب الكليني طاب ثراه أنه كان يعتقد التحريف والنقصان في القرآن لأنه روى روايات
في هذا المعنى في كتابه الكافي ولم يتعرض لقدح فيها مع أنه ذكر في أول الكتاب أنه كان يثق بما رواه فيه وكذلك أستاذه علي وله غلو فيه، وكذلك
الشيخ أحمد بن أبي طالب الطبرسي فإنه أيضا نسج على منوالهما في كتاب الإحتجاج.
In the first excerpt, Al-Kashani states that the abundant reports show that the format of the written Quran is not like the present Quran, and he gives some different types of tahreef that have occured.

In the second excerpt he makes it clear that Al-Kulayni and others believed in additions/deletions in the Quran, as did At-Tabarsi in his Ihtejaj.

أبو جعفر محمد بن الحسن الصفار
عن ابي جعفر الصادق انه قال : " ما من أحد من الناس يقول إنه جمع القرآن كله كما انزل لله إلا كذاب، وما جمعه وما حفظه كما أنزل إلا علي بن ابي
.( طالب والائمة من بعده (بصائر الدرجات ص 213

In the hadith of As-Saffar, related from imam Ja'far (as), it is related that he said: "There is no one that says that he compiled the Quran as it was revealed by Allah except a liar. And it was only collected and preserved by Ali ibn Abi Talib and the imams after him."

This was/is still the majority view of the shia: the present Quran is arranged differently. When imam Mahdi (as) will come, he will bring the 'Quran of Ali'.

أبو منصور أحمد بن منصور الطبرسي
إن الكناية عن أسماء أصحاب الجرائر العظيمة من المنافقين في القرآن، ليست من فعله تعالى، وإنها من فعل المغيرين والمبدلين الذين جعلوا القرآن عضين،
واعتاضوا الدنيا من الدين.

At-Tabarsi states in his Ihtijaj that the deletion of the names of the munfiqs (companions) in the Quran is not the work of Allah, but the act of the companions.

أبو الحسن العاملي
قال : اعلم أن الحق الذي لا محيص عنه بحسب القرآن الذي في أيدينا قد وقع فيه بعد رسول الذين جمعوه القرآن المحفوظ عما ذكر الموافق لما أنزله الى ابنه
. ( الحسن. (تفسير مرآة الأنوار ومشكاة الأسرار 36
After stating "And know that the truth of the matter is..." Al-'Amili also declares that the compilation of the Quran has been distorted.

محمد باقر المجلسي
في معرض شرحه لحديث هشام بن سالم عن ابي عبد لله عليه السلام "إن القرآن الذي جاء به جبرائيل عليه السلام إلى محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم سبعة عشر ألف آية " قال
عن هذا الحديث :
" موثق ، وفي بعض النسخ عن هشام بن سالم موضع هارون بن سالم ، فالخبر صحيح. ولا يخفى أن هذا الخبر وكثير من الأخبار الصحيحة صريحة في
نقص القرآن وتغييره وعندي أن الأخبار في هذا الباب متواترة معنى ، وطرح جميعها يوجب رفع الاعتماد عن الأخبار رأساً ، بل ظني أن الأخبار في هذا
الباب لا يقصر عن أخبار الإمامة فكيف يثبتونها بالخبر?" [مرآة العقول ج 12 ص 525 ] (أي كيف يثبتون الإمامة بالخبر إذا طرحوا أخبار التحريف?)

Allama Majlisi, the author of Bihar al-Anwar, in his commentary for a hadith states that the hadith of tahreef is sahih. He then confirms that the reports of distortion are in fact mutawatir, and hence it is incumbent to believe in them. He then says something very interesting: how can one accept the narrations regarding imamate, and reject the narrations of tahreef ? The nature of both is the same.

"ONLY MEHDI WILL BRING THE REAL QUR'AN. UNTIL THEN USE THE AVAILABLE QUR'AN. REMEMBER! ONE WHO HAS NO "TAQAYYA" HAS NO RELIGION" (Faslul-Kitab, Immam Kalani, Aljaezari on the authourity of Hazrat Ali )

" THE HIDDEN IMMAM MEHDI WILL BRING A NEW RELIGION AND THE NEW BOOK AS HE COMES (Faslul-Kitab)

"QUR,AN WHICH HAD FORTY PARTS AND SEVENTEEN THOUSAND VERSES" (Habillah vol. 6 page 32) in the same volume in the same book, godly attributes are given to the hidden Immam, he can bring people to life(like Jesus) and kill them and then raise them and kill them over and over.

[Fatah-Momin]

Shia beliefs

Quran, Imam Ali(a.s) and Shi'a

In The Name Of Allah,
The Most Compassionate, The Merciful
O Allah! Send your blessings to the head of your Messengers and the
Last of your Prophets Muhammad ( saw ),and his pure and cleansed progeny.




Part 1


The Glorious Quran Chapter 2 Verse 207

And among men there is one who selleth his self ( soul ) seeking the pleasure of God; and verily, God is affectionate unto His (faithful) servants.

It is held unanimious by the Scholars of the two Islamic schools, that this verse was revaled for Imam Ali ( as ), when he readily slept in the bed of the Prophet ( pbuh&f ) , when the latter to the will of God had to migrate from Mecca to Medina. The one who would agree to offer himself instead of the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) who was wanted by the enemy must essentially have

- The safety of the Prophet ( pbuh&f ) prefered to his own safety
- Implicit faith in the duty of a man to earn the pleasure of the Almighty Allah and His Prophet Muhammad ( pbuh&f ), at any cost, even at the cost of his own life
- The courage of surrendering himself willingly with the utmost peace of mind, to sleep under the swords, ready to fall upon him
- The confidence and faith in God's protection

And on the night of Hijrah, Allah the glorious revealed to Jibrail and Mikail I have eshtablished brotherhood between you two and have ordained the life of one longer than the life of the other. Now, are you willing to make a present of the extra length of life to the other?

But each prefered the longer life for himself. Then Allah revealed

Why not follow the example of Ali ibn Abu Talib. I have established brotherhood between him and Muhammad (pbuh&f). He is now sleeping on the bed of Muhammad in order to save his life by sacrificing his own. Now descend both of you to the earth and protect him from his enemies.

Both the angels descended. Jibrail took up his position near Ali's head and Mikail near his feet. Jibrail was crying out aloud Excellent. Excellent. O son of Abu Talib! There is none like you. Allah is making boast of you before the angels.

And it was on this very occasion that the above verse was revealed.

- Tafsir al Kabir, by Fakhr ad Din al Razi, v 2 p 189 ( for the above narrt )
- Hakim al Mustadrak, v 3 p 4
- Ghayatul Maryam, p 344 -> 345
- Tafseer e Qurtubi, v 3 p 347
- Asadul Ghaiba fe Marifatil As Sahaba, v 4 p 25
- Tafseer Nishapoori ( Allama Nishapori ) , v 1 p 281
- Kifyatul Talib, p 114
- Zhakhiar al Uqba, p 88
- Noor ul Absar, p 86

Imam Ali ( as ) composed about this incident ( poetry )

I staked my life for the man who was the best of all those
who circumbulated the Ancient House and the Sacred Stone !

Part 2
Glorious Quran Chapter II - Verse 269

He granteth wisdom to whomsoever He willeth, and he who have been granted wisdom hath been given abundant good; and none shall mind it save those endowed with wisdom.

In the above verse the word "Wisdom" implies the best knowledge seeking to act with fullness and soundness of one's own conscience. True knowledge is spiritual illumination or divine guidance worked through the grace of God as and when the necessity occurs. This being the active result of the constant seeking for it by those who obtained nearness to the Allmighty!

It is held by many Sunni scholars, that this verse was revealed for Imam Ali ( as ). It is not surprising that, such a unique gift ( of being granted wisdom ) is inspiration (Ilhaam) which is conferred upon the purified ones.

Sunni references:

- Shawahid al Tanzeel ( Allama Haskani ), v 1 p 106
- al Bidahiya wan Nihayiah, v 7 p 359 with a tradition from the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f )


Wisdom has been divided into 10 ( ten ) parts, and 9 (nine) of these are possessed by Ali,
and the remaining has been divided among the rest of the people.



- Kanz al Ummal, v 6 p 154
- Asadul Bilagha, v 4 p 22 and v 1 p 22
- Kitabul Sagheer, p 15
- Manaqib Khawarizmi, p 49
- Dhakhair al Uqba, p 78
- Musnad of Ahmed Hanbal, v 1 pages 140 and 185
- Maqtal Hussain, v 1 p 43

Part 3
Glorious Quran Chapter 3 Verse 61

And unto him who disputeth with thee therein after the knowledge hath come unto thee, Say! ( O' Our Apostle Muhammad!) (Unto them) come ye, let us summon our sons, and (ye summon) your sons, and (we summon) our women and (ye) your women, and (we summon) ourselves and then let us invoke the curse of God on the liars!

This verse refers to the famous event of ' Mubahila ' which took place in the year 10 A.H against the Christians of Najran. A deputation of 60 Christians of Najran headed by Abdul Masih their chief monkpriest came and discussed with the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) the personality of Hazrat Eesa ( as ). The Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) told them not to deify Jesus for he was only a mortal created by God, and not God Himself. Then they asked who the father of Jesus was. By this, they thought that since he was born without a father the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) would helplessly accept Jesus' father being God himself. In reply to this question was revealed the Verse.

Verily, similitude of Jesus with God is as the similitude of Adam; He created him out of dust then said He unto him BE, and he became.

When the Christians did not agree to this line of reasoning, then this verse was revealed enjoining upon the Prophet (pbuh&f ) to call the Christians to Mubahila. To this the Christians agreed and they wanted to return to their place and would have the Mubahila the next day.

Early next morning the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) sent Salman al Farsi ( May Allah be well pleased with him ) to the open place, fixed outside the city for the historic event, to erect a small shelter for himself and those he intended to take along with him for the contest. On the opposite side appeared the Christian priests, while at the appointed hour the Christians witnessed the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) entering the field with Imam Hussain ( as ) in his lap, Imam Hasan ( as ) holding his finger, and walking beside him, Lady Fatima ( as ) and followed by Imam Ali al Murtaza ( as ). The Prophet ( as ) on reaching the appointed spot stationed himself with his daughter, her two sons and her husband, raising his hands towards the heaven said:
Lord these are the People of my House

The Chief Monk on knowing that the baby in the lap of the Prophet (pbuh&f) was his young grandson, Imam Hussain (as), the child walking holding the Prophet's ( pbuh&f ) hand was his first grandson, Imam Hasan ( as ), the Lady behind him was daughter, his only surviving issue was Fatima ( as ) the mother of the two children and the one who followed the Lady was his son in law, the husband of Fatima ( as ), addressed the huge crowd of the people who had gathered on the spot, and addressed them saying

By God, I see the faces which, if they pray to God for mountains to move from their places, the mountains will immediately move!

O believers in the Jesus of Nazareth, I will tell you the truth that should ye fail to enter into some agreement with Muhammad and if these souls whom Muhammad has brought with him, curse you, ye will be wiped out of existence to the last day of the life of the earth!

The people readily agreed to the advice counseled by their Leader. They beseeched the Holy Prophet ( pbuh&f ) to give up the idea of the agreed Mubahila and requested for themselves to be allowed to continue their faith, offering to pay ' Jizya '.



- Al Tabari, Commentary of the Quran, v 2 p 192 -> 193



This historic event of a unique triumph of Islam is taken by the Shias as a religious thanksgiving festival of the triumph against falsehood. Some of the significance of this event are as follows:

- this event unquestionably establishes the truth about the spiritual purity of the Ahl al Bayt
- it proves beyond any doubt as to who are the members of the house of the Prophet ( pbuh&f )
- the seriousness and the solemnity of the occasion demands absolute purity, spiritual as well as physical in the individuals to serve in the fateful occasion for the Holy Prophet to present them to God as the best one of His creation to be heard in the prayers of Truth!



Sunni references

- Ghayatul Maryam, p 300
- Sahih Muslim, v 4 p 1285 ( English Edition), the tradition is as follows:

...( The third occasion is this ) when the following verse was revealed : Let us summon our children and your children. Allah's messenger (pbuh&f) called Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Hussain and said : O Allah, these are my family ...

Part 4
Glorious Quran Chapter 3 Verse 103

And hold ye fast by the cord of God All together and be not divided ( among yourselves ) ...

Some Sunni scholars and commentators agree that the above verse reflects on the Ahl al Bayt. Here are some references

- Thalabi records on his Commentary Tafsir al Kabir from Aban ibn Tabligh that he heard Imam Jafer as Sadiq ( as ) say:

We are the Rope of Allah about whom Allah has said: Hold fast to the Rope of Allah ...



- Shafi'i is reported by Abu Bakr ibn Shabah al Din in Rishfaht al Sadi to have said:

When I saw People carried off
Their departure to the sea of error and ignorance
In the name of Allah I boarded the ship of Salvation
That is the Ahl al Bayt of Mustafa, the Seal of Prophecy
And I caught hold of the Rope of Allah, that is their Love
As He commanded us to hold fast to the Rope!

- A tradition from the Holy prophet ( pbuh&f )

I will soon be called away and will have to depart from you, but
I leave among you Two ( 2 ) weighty things, the Book of Allah and
my descendants. The Book of Allah is like a rope which extends from
the heavens to the earth, and my descendants are my people of the
house ( my Ahl al Bayt ). The Subtle and the Aware tells me that
the two ( 2 ) shall never part company until they come to me at the
Pool. So take care how you treat them after me.

As recorded in

- Musnad of Ahmed Hanbal, v 3 p 17
- Musnad of Ahmed Hanbal, v 3 p 26
- Sahih of al Tirmizi, tradition no. 874
- Kanz al Ummal, v 1 p 47, tradition no. 945 ( for the above hadeeth )
- Ghayatul Maryam, p 242
- Yanibul Muwaddah, p 118 -> 119
- Sawaiq al Muhriqah, v 1 chapter 11
- Safinatul Biharij ( Recorded by Allama Qummi from Allama Zamakhsari ) p 193

CODE

http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/p.php?p=ah...l=Introductions

[Fatah-Momin]

Replies: 14
Views: 423 For those blind Shi'ites who deny that al-Kulayni and their infallible Imams believe in the distortion of the Holy Qur'an, we present them the following from Usool al-Kafy vol. 2, Kitaab: Fadlul-Qur'an, narration # 28:

Ali b. al-Hakam from Hishaam b. Salim from Abu Abdullah [as] saying: Verily, the Qur'an which Gibril [as] came up with to Muhammad [saw] is 17,000 verses.

 17000verse.jpg (35.41K)
Number of downloads: 0

This means 2/3ed of the Qur'an is missing !!!

But most interesting, is the narration # 27 which says:

Muhammad b. yahya, from Ahmad b. Muhammad, from Ali b. al-Hakam, from Abdullah b. Farqad & Al-Mu'allaa b. Khunays, both said: We were with Abu Abdullah [as] and with us was Rabi'ah al-Ra'y (of AhluSunnah) and have talked about the virtues of Qur'an, upon which Abu Abdullah [as] said: Ibn Masoud does not recite our way of recitation, he is mislead (Dhaall). Rabi'ah said: Mislead?!! He said: yes mislead. Then Abu ABdullah [as] said: As for us, we recite the recitation of Ubayy.

Now the question arises, why not the recitation of Ali or Fatimah? LOL why making Taqleed to Ubayy b. Ka'b [ra] This proves that even Ahlul-Bayt make taqleed to the honorable Sahabah [ra] all.

And following is another evidence that the Munaafiqeen called Shi'ites, hold firm to the theory of Tahreef:

 AA17000tahreef0.jpg (61.68K)
Number of downloads: 0

Ali b. Muhammad, from some of his associates, from Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Abu Nasr, saying: Abul-Hasan [as] gave me a Mus-haf and said: do not look into it. But I did open it and read: "Those who disbelieved" (98:1) and found therein the names of seventy men of Quraish listed by their names and the names of their fathers. (The narrator said): He then sent for me (a message saying) send me back the Mus-haf.

Masha Allah .... keep denying your Jewish Aqeedah regarding the Qur'an

[Fatah-Momin]

In his book Ahtejaj Tabrisi attribute a hadith to Ameerul Momineen Hz. Ali[ra] " Allah named his messenger[saw] YASEEN and then in Quran said SALAAM ALA AALAY YASEEN and not SALAAM ALA AALAY MUHAMMAD, because Allah knew that the companions will remove it from the Quran as they did remove lot of things from Quran" [ Ahtejaj tabrisi vol:1 #259 ]

[Fatah-Momin]

Tafsir Safi by Fayz Kashani.
المستفاد من جميع هذه الأخبار وغيرها من الروايات من طريق أهل البيت عليهم السلام إن القرآن الذي بين أظهرنا ليس بتمامه كما انزل على محمد صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم بل منه ما هو خلاف ما أنز الله ومنه ما هو مغير ومحرف وإنه قد حذف عنه أشياء كثيرة منها اسم علي عليه السلام في كثير من المواضع ومنها غير ذلك وأنه ليس أيضا على الترتيب المرضي عند الله وعند رسوله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم .
وبه قال علي بن إبراهيم

CODE

http://www.rafed.net/books/olom-quran/al-safi-01/03.html#7

'It is clear from all of these traditions and quotations from the Family of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) that the present Quran is not the complete Quran which was revealed to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). In fact, there are verses that contradict that which was revealed; verses that have been distorted and places where omissions have been made such as the names of Ali, the Family of Muhammad (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and, on several occasions, there were the names of the hypocrites. Moreover, the present order of the Quran is not according to the preferred order of Allah and His Messenger. Ali ibn Ibrahim (a renowned commentator) also holds this opinion.' (Tafseer of Saafi: l:49)

 tahreef.jpg (119.07K)
Number of downloads: 0

[Fatah-Momin]

 shiatafseer1.jpg (86.69K)
Number of downloads: 0

And shayh Mufid said: "Narrations from aimmatul huda, from family of Muhammad shows that there are antagonisms in Quran due to deletion and decreasing in it by "zalimin""

[Fatah-Momin]

 shiatafseer3.jpg (123.66K)
Number of downloads: 0

Kashani "Tafsir as-safi" vol 1, p 52
As for (the opinion of) OUR SCHOLARS (may Allah be pleased with them (!!!)) on this topic, then what is obvious from Thiqatul Islam Muhammad bin Ya’kub AL-KULAYNI that he believed in the MANIPULATION AND LOSS in the QURAAN because he recorded narrations of this meaning in his book Al-Kafi without criticizing it at all, besides he mentioned at the beginning of his book that he trusted in what he had narrated and also (this applies to) his teacher Ali bin Ibrahim Al-Qummy (may Allah be pleased with him (!!!)) since his tafsir is full of that (manipulation of the Quraan) and he has some extremism on this topic and also Sheikh Ahmad bin Abi Talib Al-TABRASSI (may Allah be pleased with him (!!!)) since he followed these two (on this matter) exactly in his Al-Ihtijaj”

[Fatah-Momin]

There are hadiths which point to the coming of the Fitnah of the Yahudiyya Based Shii Doctrine. The Following hadiths have been affirmed to be good and reliable so the Baseless objection that they are fabricated and weak is without foundation.

Since I have these hadiths in Turkish I will translate them for you:

Recorded by Dar Qutni:

Hazrat Fatimah as Zahra (ra) said Rasulullah[saw] told Hazrat Ali (kw) "O'Ali verily you and your community are in Paradise... For most surely a fraction of people will argue that they Love you but most evidently they will besmear Islam....Then they will forgo that and throw it aside. They will Leave Islam just like How an Arrow lives the Bow....They have a Lakab(nickname) by which they will be identified they will be called "RAFIDAH"....If you reach up to them FIGHT against them! Because they are indeed MUSHRIKS!

Dar Qutni relates that in regard to this Hadith there are many methods all of which has been compiled in his book "Musnad Fatimah"

In a Similar narration as recorded by Dar Qutni from Ummu Selema (ra) who narrated "What are there signs?"
"They shall not attend Jumuah and Jamaah...They will unleash their tongues upon the Salaf."

Many of the Muhadithin narrate from Hz. Ali (kw) the following:

Ali (kw) said: Rasulullah[saw] informed me "You and your Jamaah will be in Paradise...In the near future there shall arise those named RAFIDAH. If you reach them kill them because they are Mushriks!..."

In Ibni Asimla Ibni Shahin narrations the following description is given of them as traced to Hz. Ali (kw) "I said O' Rasulullah what are there signs?"
"They will attribute to you things which do not pertain to you and will praise you with it and they will curse and besmear the rest of my Ashab..."

[Fatah-Momin]

The belief of a Shia for Quran is:

The present Quran is not the original Quran. To some of them, the Quran's authenticity is doubtful, and if it appears to contradict any of their sectarian beliefs or doctrines, then they give the Quranic text strange, far-fetched interpretations that agree with their sectarian views. For that reason they are called Al-Mutawwilah (those who give their own interpretations to the revealed texts). They love to draw attention to the discord that occurred at the time when the Quran was first compiled. The views and opinions of their Imams are the primary source of their jurisprudence.

1. There are seventeen thousand Ayah in real Quran. (Al Shafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 616)

2. The comparison between the Holy Quran and Shia's Quran. (which was compiled by Hazrat Ali R.A. and will be brought by Imam-e-Ghaib near Qayamat. (Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 123)

3. No one possess complete knowledge of Holy Quran except Imams. (Asool Kaafi, Vol. No. 1, Page No. 228)

4. "An alteration in the Holy Quran". (Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol. No. 7, Page No. 415)

5. "Changes in Quran for Drinker Khulafa-e-Rashideen". (Translation Of Quran Majeed by Maqbool Hussain Dehlevi, Page No. 479)

6. "Insult of Holy Quran". (Tohfa-tul-Awaam, Vol. No. 2, page No. 293)

7. Pakistan is mentioned in the Original Holy Quran, present Quran is meaningless. (Hazaar Tumhari Das Hamari, Page No. 554)

8. Quran was ascended in four parts whereas present Quran is consist of three parts. (Shia Aur Tehreef-e-Quran, page No. 62)


9. Quran is altered corrupted and in perverted form (Shia belief). (Fatuhat-e-Shia, Page No. 129)

10. The present Quran is abridged where as the Original Quran is kept by Imam Mehdi. (Hazaar Tumhari Das Hamari, Page No. 553)

11. "An acceptance of the belief of tempering of Holy Quran, insult of Abu Bakr (r.a)". (Ayat-ul-Qaloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 832)

12. Shaikheen (r.a) refused to accept the Quran which was compiled by Hazrat Ali (r.a). (Fasal-ul-Khitab, Page No. 64)

13. Quran was eaten by God. (Min Kitab-ul-Burhan Fee Tafseer-ul-Quran, Page No. 38)

14. Renegades changed the Original Holy Quran. (Quran Majeed by Hakeem Syed Maqbool, Page No. 1011)

15. "Un Islamic views of Holy Quran and revive of Abu Bakr". (Sheikh-e-Saqifa, Page No. 138)

16. The main compilers of Quran interpreted changed corrupted and perverted the Holy Quran. (Al-Ehtijaj, Page No. 257)