Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Fatah-Momin

Dragged through streets

25 posts in this topic

Khumayni-Dead.jpg

This is the same person who during one of his Juma khutbas said that it his ardent wish that he wanted to drag the body of Hazrat Umer image009.gif (naouzobillah) through the streets

_361040_funeral300.jpg

khomeini.jpg

KHOMEINI'S DECLARATION

"The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement ... when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet's grave."

(Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally).

Khomeinism and Islam,

page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi

Edited by Fatah-Momin
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Admin Note: To view images on this board guest should be a registered member and logged on

KHOMEINI SAID:

"The Islamic and non-Islamic powers of the world will not admit our power till such time that we establish our hold over Makkah and Madinah because these are the centers and citadels of Islam. Hence our domination over these places Is an essential requirement ... when as a conqueror I will enter Makkah and Madinah, the first thing to be done at that time by me would be to dig out two idols (Abu Bakr and Umar) lying by the side of the Prophet's grave."

(Ayatullah Khomeini of Iran, while addressing a message for a youth rally).

Khomeinism and Islam,

page 8 by Abu Rehan Farooqi

Then we saw the body of this very man dragged through the streets of his own city like a dog, by his own followers/fans

post-25-1237062908_thumb.jpg

post-25-1237063010_thumb.jpg

post-25-1237062943_thumb.jpg

post-25-1237062967_thumb.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KHOMEINI ON QURAN IN HIS "KASHFUL ASRAR"

"TAHREEF (deliberate alteration of words to change the meaning of the holy books, namely, the Bible, etc.) is that fault which Muslims accuse Jews and Christians of indulging in, has proved to be found in the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)."

(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114)

"It was easy for the Ashaabs (of Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to remove verses from the Holy Quran and deliberately add verses to it, and in this way forever concealing from the people of the world the true Quran."

(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGE 114)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The height of frenzy occurred at the gravesite itself. Bringing the body by land vehicle was out of the question, so it arrived by helicopter. The first time the helicopter landed, the crowd swarmed in and grabbed pieces of the shroud, causing the corpse actually to fall to the ground. After fifteen frantic minutes, the coffin was put back on the helicopter, which then bore the body away. In an attempt to thin out the crowd, it was announced that the funeral had been postponed by a day. The trick worked, as many went home. Then, six hours after the first attempt, a second effort at a helicopter landing was made. This time more guards were around and the body was placed in a metal casket. Still, it was not easy. As the Iranian news agency described it: "The grave was only ten meters away but the pushing and shoving of thousands made it seem like kilometers. It took ten terrible minutes to be able to put the casket down near the grave." Once the body had finally been buried, concrete blocks were placed on top of it.

http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2004/11/scenes-from-three-funerals-arafat-khomeini.html

Edited by Fatah-Momin
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Khomeni writes about Hz. Uthman (R.A.):

"We worship and recognise only that God Whose actions are based on concrete rationalism and Who does not rule against that rationalism. We do not worship a Allah[god] who creates a building for Divine worship and justice and then strives to destroy that very building himself by giving authority to rascals like Yazid, Mu'awiyah and Uthman. (Kashful Asraar:: 107)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Khomeini in the light of his own books

Imam Khomeini, also, is an author. Formerly, I could get hold of two of his books: Al-Hukumat-ul-Islmia and Tahrir-ul-Wasila. Later, I obtained his book, Kashful Asrar. I have already written about the first book. The book, Tahrir-ul-Wasilah, is probably his biggest work running into two large side volumes, of about six hundred pages each. It deals with jurisprudence. There is no doubt that it is a comprehensive work on the subject and covers all matters of jurisprudence from washing after natural evacuation, wazu (ablution) and bathing to inheritance. In my view, there is hardly anything arising in the life of a man which may not have been touched upon in this book from the point of view of Shia religion. The style of writing is clear and easily understandable. The work shows his proficiency and high quality of scholarship.

The points of views, doctrines and tenets of Khomeini as they emerge from a study of his works will be reproduced in his own words so that people who are suffering from any misunderstanding or delusion about him may know exactly where he stands. As the Quran says:

"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kashf-ul-Israr

What we have seen in the preceding pages about the beliefs of Ruhullah Khomeini, particularly his conviction and attitude concerning the first three Caliphs, was based only on one of his books entitled, Al-Hukumat-ul-Islamia. Till then, we had only that book among his writings with us, in which the nomination of Hazrat Ali to the office of the Imamate and the Caliphate, by the Holy Prophet, under the command of God, had been mentioned in such a manner that no conclusion could be derived from it except that the first three Caliphs and all the Companions who had accepted them as the deputies and Caliphs of the sacred Prophet and the heads of the Islamic state and taken the pledge of loyalty at their hands were nothing but traitors to God and the Apostle, and apostates and renegades. But, as we have remarked, Khomeini had laid this charge on them so cleverly and skillfully, in that book, that the name of none of them had come to be mentioned anywhere in it, and we have, also, explained on what grounds of political expediency he had preferred that course.

But, fortunately, after it we obtained another of his books called Kashful Asrar about which we had learnt only a few days earlier that, in it, Khomeini had indulged in Tabarra (curse malediction; imprecation; execration) against Hazrat Abu Bakr, Hazrat Omar and Hazrat Usman and other leading Companions in the manner of ordinary Tabarrai1 Shias. It is written in Persian and contains about three hundred and fifty pages.

In it, Khomeini has stated with full force and clarity that Hazrat Abu Bakr, Hazrat Omar and Hazrat Usman and all the prominent Companions who supported them were seekers of the world and extremely vicious and evil-minded. They were Muslims only in name, but apostates and infidels in reality. They had accepted Islam simply out of lust for power and rule and could stoop to anything to gain their objective. If needed, they could make alterations in the Quran and invent false traditions. There was no fear of God in their hearts and were wholly devoid of faith. If they felt that their purpose would be gained by abandoning Islam and turning into its bitter enemies like Abu Jahal and Abu Lahab they would not have abstained.

Though Khomeini has used an extremely painful language to show disrespect to the first three Caliphs and the Holy Companions at numerous places in Kashful Asrar, we will be, as a highly unpleasant duty, reproducing a few passages, belonging only to one discussion from it. It should be borne in mind that our purpose in the present volume is merely to acquaint the readers with Khomeini

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Khomeini's 'goats' more superior to the Sahabah

Trying to instill a sense of inferiority in others in order to highlight the virtues of another, a technique called 'example by debasement,' is a tendency of many. Whilst some do this to maybe, through invoking jealousy, get a truant brother to follow in the footsteps of his bigger more well-behaved brother, the Shi'ahs do this in order to claim their place (if any) amongst the Muslims of the world. By doing so, the virtues of those who are compared is lost, their good points too, lose all appeal, and all focus and excellence is shifted to the one who is compared to.

Khomeini is no different. Trying to stifle opposition from the local clerics and mullahs after the revolution, he compared them to the 'local Iranian people, who, had it not been for their oppression, the army would not have been victorious in war.' Khomeini then used his tactic of debasement; and as usual, the noble Sahabah were the victims.

He said: "Today, the volunteers wanting to go to the battlefields embrace martyrdom in such a whole-hearted way that this was unprecedented even during the period of the Prophet Muhammad and Hazrat 'Ali. It is mentioned in Qur'aan that when the Prophet used to invite people to war, they did not obey and were providing excuses to postpone the event for another day, or talked of either cold or hot weather." (Tehran Times, vol III no: 222, March 11, 1982)

If the Sahabah did not support the Holy Prophet in his campaigns, how it is that when Sayyidina 'Ali came to power, he found a kingdom stretching from Madinah as far as Jerusalem to the west, Azerbaijan tot he East, and practically the whole of north Africa at his feet? Khalid Dhorat (Mawlana)

[Source: http://www.jamiat.org.za/isinfo/kgoats.html]

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VIEWS OF KHOMEINI FROM HIS BOOK, "KASHFUL ASRAR"

"From the examples I (Khomeini) have given, it shows that the Sheiks Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu) and Umar (radi Allahu anhu) had acted against the Quran. For these people to behave in such a manner amongst the Muslims was not surprising. The Muslims (Sahaba-e-Kiraam) were also in such a state that they were either part of the same group (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu - and Umar -radi Allahu anhu) or they had similar intentions of becoming the government in power.

"If they (the Muslims) did not side them (Abu Bakr - radi Allahu anhu - and Umar - radi Allahu anhu ) then it was certain that they did not have the courage to speak out against those who behaved badly towards Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his beloved daughter (Fathima - radi Allahu anha).

"In short, even if mention was made in the Quran in clear words on this matter (The succession of Ali - radi Allahu anhu - as Caliph), they would not have changed their intentions, and even at the Command of Allah they would not have given up the seat (of Government).

"Abu Bakr (radi Allahu anhu), who had harboured pre-meditated plans, if anything, would have falsely forged a Hadith to put an end to this matter, just as he had done so to prevent Hazrat Fathima (radi Allahu anha) from receiving her inheritance. And it was not impossible for Umar (radi Allahu anhu) in the matter regarding the Imaamat and Khilaafat of Ali (radi Allahu anhu) to negate such a verse (regarding the Khilaafat of Ali - radi Allahu anhu) either by saying that there was a mistake in Allah's Revelation of the Ayah, or that Gibraeel had erred in transmitting (Allah's Message) correctly to Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)."

(KASHFUL ASRAR, PAGES 119-120)

"All prophets came for the purpose of laying down the foundation of justice in the world, but they failed to do so; even Prophet Muhammad, the last of the Prophets who came to reform mankind And to apply justice failed too. The person who will succeed in all this and in laying down the foundation of justice in the world at all levels, and redressing the wrong is the expected mahdi...."

me of the sayings of Khomeini....Especially for those who love to defend him or try to find excuses for this doomed kafir.

نسب الخميني إلى علي قوله : كنت مع الأنبياء باطناً ومع رسول الله ظاهراً. مصباح الهداية ص 142 .

Khomeini accredited these words to Ali (ra): "I was present with (all) prophets in elusive form but (my presences) was manifest with Messenger of Allah."

Misbah Al-Hidayah p.142

ويقول تحت قوله تعالى (( يدبر الأمر يفصل الآيات لعلكم بلقاء ربكم توقنون )) قال : أي ربكم الذي هو الإمام . مصباح الهداية ص 145.

And commenting under the aya (He regulates all affairs, explaining the Ayat in detail, that you may believe with certainty in the meeting with your Lord

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is essential that Muslim sympathisers of the shia divest themselves of the notion that Shi

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

post-25-1237065442_thumb.jpg

Article 11:

The predominant and stronger opinion is the permissibility of having anal sex with the wife with an aweful disliking, but it is better not to specially with her refusal.

Artcile 12:

It is not permissible to have a sexual entercourse with wife prior to her completion of nine years of age, be it on a perminant or temporary marriage. As for the rest of pleasurable acts such as touching with pleasure, hugging and (placing xxx between) thighs, it is perfectly fine even with a toddler child. In the event he had a sexual entercourse with her prior to her completion of nine years of age but without removing her verginity, there's no consequential penalty against him.

****

Masha Allah, we can perfectly understand why he had these 2 poor childs on his lap. But aside from this, and the filth associated with anal sex, what lunatic crazy sex maniaque would want to sexually molest a toddler except him being a shi'a? What kind of a religion is that?

Even the toddlers cannot be spared away? This is by Allah a mental sickness that goes beyond imagination. My advice to all the brothers and sisters, never ever think of leaving your child with a Shi'a baby sitter no matter what.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Khomeini: "The belief that the status of our Imaams is such that it is not achievable by any of the angels who may be near to Al-Laah, or any Prophet (sent by Al-Laah), is one of the fundamentals of our Shiite faith", page 58 of Vilaayat-e-Faqeeh, published by Intisharaate Aazaadi, Qum, Seh Rah Mozah.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HIS CLAIM THAT THE SHIITE IMAMS ARE BETTER THAN ALL OF THE ANGELS AND MESSENGERS

In his book 'The Islamic Government', Khomeini says:

"Verily, the imam has a praised station, a supreme rank and universal1 sovereignty to which authority and command submit all the atoms of this universe. And of the imperatives of our religion is that our imams occupy a praised station which is accessible by neither a close angel nor a sent prophet.... And in accordance with the narrations and traditions that are in our possession, the greatest Messenger and the imams, peace be on them, were light before the existence of this world, then Allah made them surround His Throne. It has been related to them that they have states with Allah which are encompassed by neither a close angel nor a sent prophet"(l)

Ever since this book was published, the Muslim scholars have been issuing their deliverances condemning Khomeini to hi and apostasy for the following reasons:

1-There is neither a vase in the Qur'an nor an authentic tradition from the Messenger of Allah referring to the eminence or Imamate of the alleged imams, let alone the alleged status related to them.

2-The so-called 'Universal vice-gerency' requires, from Khomeini's standpoint, that when those imams say to a thing Be, it is. ("...and to them submit the atoms of this universe.") This indeed is a quality restricted only to Allah, the Creator, who is far removed from every imperfection. He stands in need of no supporters or helpers in creation nor are there any to share His dominion, as He says: "Say, Call upon Those you allege beside Allah , They control not even the weight of an ant in the heavens nor on the earth,[(1) pp. 52, Cairo, 1979 ] nor have they any share in either, and He has no helper among them." (34.22) He, extolled be His glory, also says, "Blessed is He m Whose hand is the domain, and has power over all things." (67.1) All the domain is in the hand of Allah alone; He does not pass any portion thereof to any of His slaves. He says, "Those of you who allege beside Him own not 'Qitmeer:" (the thin skin which is upon the datestone.) Allah the exalted says, referring to the angels, "They say, 'The Beneficent has taken to Himself a son, far removed is He from what they attribute to Him, Say, they are only honored slaves. They speak not before He speaks and they act only by His commands. He knows what is before them and what is behind them, and they intercede not except for him whom He approves. They are awestricken fearing Him. Whoever of them should say: 'I am a god beside Him, him shall We requite with Hell. Thus do We requite the unbelievers." (21.26, 27, 28, 29)

Thus the angels who are the close slaves of Allah have no command over the disposal of their own affairs, and have no share in His dominion.

Similarly all of the Messengers of Allah, who are the best of men, share absolutely nothing with Allah; Allah speaks of the best one of them, Muhammad (). "Say, 'I do not say to you, I possess the treasures of Allah, nor do I know the unseen." (6.50) The same words were uttered by Noah to his people. Allah also addresses His Messenger: "Say, 'I have no power to do you harm or benefit." (73.21) And Allah the Exalted says addressing His Messenger: "Say, 'I have no power to do myself harm or benefit." (7.188)

If the Messengers of Allah and His angels have no power to do themselves benefit or harm, nor any of them has command over the affairs, rather all of them are slaves belonging to Allah, and are subservient to His command, the claim that the alleged imams have control over the atoms of the universe and assume the universal vice-gerency constitutes a plain Kufr, unbelief, and shirk, or attribution of copartners to Allah in His most exclusive attribute, the Lordship; exalted be He above what they attribute to Him. The claim that the imams have a special status with Allah attained by neither a close angel nor a sent Messenger is a lie related- to those imams, an assertion of polytheism and apostasy.

3- The assertion that the imams and the Messenger were light before they were brought into existence is blasphemy, and is not substantiated by the Qur'an, the Sunnah or the consensus of the Muslims. It is a blasphemous lie with which the polytheists from the nation of Muhammad resemble their brothers of the other nation who believe Jesus to be the incarnate word of Allah. All the Messengers are created human beings, as Allah says: "Say, Verily, I am only a human like yourselves; it is revealed to me.." (l8.llO) Thus the Messenger never was light or created out of light, but rather is like the rest of the sons of Adam except that Allah has distinguished him with the Prophethood and the Message.

The alleged imams were distinguished by nothing of that nature. The assertion that they were light before they were brought into existence, and that they surrounded the throne of Allah, is plain blasphemy and clear deviation. Had this been true, it would have been included in the Book of Allah and in the Sunnah of His Messenger, but it is the falsehood of habitual liars and polytheists. Defying men and attributing lordship to them is tantamount to associating partners to Him, exalted is He from what they attribute to Him. He is the One Who was and nothing was with Him. He is the first, before Whom there was none; He is the Internal underneath Whom there is none, extolled be His glory. He created all by His power and greatness, and by virtue of His saying to a thing Be, it is. He created Adam from the mud of this earth, and made his posterity out of the known substance by mating the male and female. There is none of Adam's posterity who was created out of light, nor was any of them light before he was created. Similarly, he who claims that a human being has access to the unseen, has control over the disposal of the affairs, or is infallible to slips, not subject to oblivion, has knowledge equal to that of Allah, and is qualified in the same way as the Lord, is an infidel who does not believe in Allah, and a polytheist who makes out of the creatures contenders with Allah equal to Him. Far above is He from what they ascribe to Him.

4- Attributing excellence to those who are not prophets, distinguishing them above the Messengers and Prophets, is an act of disbelief and polytheism, because Allah has selected the Messengers and the Prophets from mankind as Allah has selected the Messengers and the Prophets over the rest of the believers is known by necessity from the religion, and agreed upon by the Muslim nation, rejected only by the apostate who deny the Oneness of Allah, justice and faith. Thus the assertion that Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, was better than Prophets Ibraheem, Noah or Yunus bin Matta, is an assertion of disbelief The Prophet () said, "It does not behoove a believer to say, "I am better than Yunus bin Matta". It is not permissible for a believer to claim excellence over Yunus bin Matta, the Prophet, may peace be on him, even though Allah refers to his behavior when he left his people in anger thinking that Allah would not deal him severe punishment, but instead would send him to different people. Allah says, "The fish swallowed him while he was blameworthy." (37.142) He was blameworthy for having left his people without seeking permission from Allah. "We cast him on a bare tract of land, and he was sick." That was a lesson for him, and a dear message that Prophets and Messengers were also susceptible to admonishment and punishment were they to behave other than they were expected, yet they doubtlessly occupy the rank of superiority over all mankind, a rank which can be reached by no believing follower of the Messengers, regardless of how pious he might have been. Therefore, neither Ali bin Abi Talib and his offsprings nor those who are superior to them, such as Abu Bakr and Umar, may Allah be pleased with them all, have excellence over the Prophets, for the Messengers and the Prophets are the best of the believers by virtue of being chosen by Allah and having the revelation sent down to them. Thus considering Ali or any of his offspring superior to a Prophet, Messenger or to an angel is surely blasphemy, apostasy in clear opposition to the Book of Allah, to the Sunnah of His Messenger, and to the consensus of the Muslim Ummah.

It is known that Ali himself never made such an assertion, nor did any of his sons, the believers. Rather, he said, "I surely am one of the Muslims". Nor did he claim excellence over Abu Bakr al-Siddiq and Umar. How then could he rank himself above the Prophets and Messengers, and the close angels? No! It is just a false allegation made up by the liars to add another crime in their record of notoriety against the pious believers.

5- Al-Maqam al-Mahmood, or the exalted station, shall be occupied only by a single slave of Allah, the Messenger of Allah, Muhammad referred to by Allah, "Wake up in the night to pray reciting the Qur'an as a Supererogatory act of worship for you. It may be that your Lord will raise you to an exalted station." (17.79) Al-Maqam Al-Mahmood, or the exalted station, is the privilege of the great intercession granted to the Messenger of Allah, Muhammad (), who occupies this station and shall be praised by all creatures on the Day of Resurrection. It is also a rank in Jannah granted only to one slave of Allah, who is Muhammad as he said: "When you hear the Mu'azzin repeat his words (i.e. the call to prayer), then pray for me, and ask Allah to grant me access to the honorable station of excellence; it is a rank in Jannah. It must belong to one slave of Allah, and I hope to be him. " (Muslim). Hence, neither Ali nor any member of his household shall be privileged with such a station. Whoever alleges otherwise is a disbelieving liar who falsely claims access to the knowledge of the unseen, which is restricted exclusively to Allah. Such a claim constitutes clear blasphemy.

6- The assertion that the alleged imams have with Allah Subhanahu, a distinct state which cannot be encompassed by a close angel or a sent Messenger, is a fabricated assertion. Where in the Book of Allah, or in the Sunnah of His Messenger can this be found? Or where in the statements of the truthful imams is this stated? Did Ali bin Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, or any one of his pious veracious sons claim such a distinct state? Far are they from lying against Allah the Exalt. This lie can never be made by a believer. Because such states are in the knowledge of the unseen, whoever claims this knowledge is a liar and an unbeliever. Allah says, Say, "None in the heavens and the earth knows the unseen save Allah." (27.65) Allah revealed the unseen only to a Messenger or a Prophet. Whoever alleges that a revelation was received after the death of the Messenger of Allah is 'Kafir' and 'Zindiq'. Anyone who does not believe in the finality of Prophethood and the severance of revelation is an apostate who does not believe in Allah and His Messages.

The above considerations reflect on some statements made by Khomeini in his book 'Islamic Government', and prove that he uttered nothing but blasphemy and falsehood, for which the scholars of the Muslim Ummah have condemned him to blasphemy and deviation.

HIS CLAIM THAT THE TEACHINGS OF HIS IMAMS ARE EQUAL TO THOSE IN THE QUR'AN, THAT HIS IMAMS ARE INFALLIBLE AND THAT OBLIVION OR HEEDLESSNESS DO NOT APPLY TO THEM

Khomeini also said in his book 'The Islamic Government',

"The teachings of the imams are like the teachings of the Qur'an. They do not apply to one particular generation, but rather to everyone in every age and place until the Day of Judgment.''(2)

This statement constitutes disbelief in many respects:

1-He puts the words of Allah the Exalted and those of man on an equal basis. The words of Allah cannot be equaled. They are contained in the Book to which falsehood cannot be added, and from which nothing can be removed. But the words of the others and their teachings are subject to alteration, slips and errors.

Allah has willed to safeguard nothing other than the Messages His Messengers conveyed. As for others, no one is infallible. They may be right or wrong. Neither Ali nor any of his household was infallible, nor were his teachings equal to those of Allah. For example, al-Hasan son of Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, whom the Shiites consider as one of their Imams, differed with his father in some issues. In fact the Shiites themselves differ with Ali bin Abi Talib and the imams on many issues. Khomeini himself charges Ali with fault and belittles him for accepting arbitration between him and Mu'awiyah, may Allah be pleased with them, and for refraining from speaking of what Khomeini and his gang call 'Mus-haf or Qur'an of Fatimah' and not bringing it to light. He also charges al-Hasan with fault for abdicating the leadership to Mu'awiyah, and many other errors. The significant point here is that those imams were not infallible in all of their sayings and deeds, nor were their teachings equal to those of the Qur'an, as Khomeini claims. They were like the rest of the believers and the pious slaves of Allah, except that which conforms with the Book of Allah from their teachings is accepted, and that which does not is discarded, particularly works compiled by the liars published under the names of the imam promoting falsehood and blasphemy amongst people.

They have reviled the pious imams by forging against them lies such as that they acquired the knowledge of the unseen, and that nothing in the heavens or the earth is concealed &from them. They claim to admit to Jannah whoever they please, deliver from the Fire whoever they please, control the atoms of the universe, have a free hand in the disposal of affairs, die whenever they desire, and so on and so forth. The pious imams are far above the filth of those liars. May Allah curse whoever attributes such lies to them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KHOMEINI'S DEFAMATION OF THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH

Beside reviling the imams and forging lies against them, Khomeini, may Allah deprive him of His mercy, claims that all of them failed to establish the foundation of justice, or to guide and reform humanity, saying:

"All prophets came for the purpose of laying down the foundation of justice in the world, but they failed to do so; even Prophet Muhammad, the last of the Prophets who came to reform mankind and to apply justice failed too. The person who will succeed in all this and in laying down the foundation of justice in the world at all levels, and redressing the wrong is the expected mahdi...."

"So the expected mahdi whom Allah spared as a treasure for mankind will maintain justice throughout the world, and succeed where the Prophet before him failed (!!) The reason why Allah subhanah, has spared the life of the mahdi, peace be on him, is that there is no one among men who is capable of assuming this great task which neither the prophets nor the forefathers of the mahdi achieved what they came for...."

He further maintained:

"Had the mahdi, peace be on him, passed away, there would have been no one among men to lay down the foundation of justice and maintain it in the world. Thus the expected mahdi, peace be on him, is kept for this affair. Therefore, his birthday, we ransom him with our souls, is the greatest of the Islamic holidays, and the greatest holiday of mankind(!!), because he will make justice and fairness prevail on earth. That is why we must admit that the birthday of the mahdi is the greatest of all. Upon his appearance, he will deliver mankind from its retrogress, guide all to the right path, and fill the earth with justice after it was filled with oppression. The birthday of the mahdi is a great occasion to 18 the Muslims, and is considered more important than the birthday of Prophet Muhammad. Therefore we prepare ourselves for the arrival of the expected mahdi, may peace be on him."(!!)

Khomeini went on to say:

"I can not call him leader, because he is greater than that, nor can I call him the first man, because there is no one to succeed him, therefore I can describe him with words other than 'the promised expected mahdi' whom Allah subhanah saved for mankind. So we have to prepare ourselves to behold him (!!) If we are successful, we will be able to raise our heads in pride over all our government departments. We hope that the other countries prepare themselves for the appearance of almahdi, peace be on him, and be ready for his visit.(l)

The foregoing statements by Khomeini reveal plain blasphemy in any aspects:

1- He derides and holds in light estimation the Messengers and the prophets, particularly our Prophet Muhammad . Not only that, but he also brings against Allah, extolled be His glory, the imputation of the fault of assigning the incompetent and the remiss to convey His Messages.

2- If this ignorant Khomeini means that all mankind did not respond to their Messages, nor were affected by their mission, and persisted in their disbelief and polytheism, then it should not be considered failure or lack of succession on the part of the Messenger, because accommodation to the right path is in the hands of Allah, extolled be His glory. The Messenger can only communicate and announce and make manifest the Message. The results are entirely up to Allah. Had he decreed to accommodate mankind to guidance through the Messenger, they would have been guided, and had He decreed to keep them all in deviation, then no one can do anything about it. He says, "Whoever Allah wishes to guide, He expands his bosom for

(1) An excerpt from a speech delivered by Khomeini on the 15 of Shaaban, 1400H, the result of which fatwas from the Muslim world were issued condemning Khomeini to blasphemy. The acceptance of Islam, and whoever He wishes to send astray, He makes his bosom straight and impenetrable as though he is mounting up into the sky." (6.125) Thus guidance and deviation are both in the hands of Allah alone. The Messengers are only warners, announcers of the glad tidings who strove and exerted their efforts in the cause of Allah.

All of them desired vehemently to direct people to the right path, but the will of Allah always prevails. Allah says, "So perchance you grieve your self to death for sorrow after them if they believe not in this discourse." (18.6) and,

"If your Lord had willed, He would have sure made mankind one nation; but people would not cease to differ. Save those on whom your Lord has had His mercy, for which He has created them, the word of your Lord has been fulfilled. I will surely fill Hell with jinn and man altogether." (11.118, 119).

Accommodation to guidance rests with Allah. His infinite wisdom and justice rules that only few believe, and many disbelieve, as He says: "Most men will not believe even though you eagerly desire it." (12.102) And: "But few of My slaves are grateful." (34.13)

A Messenger should not be considered a failure if most of his people do not believe, nor should he be considered unsuccessful if the majority of the people denounced him; his duty was to convey the Message. As for our Messenger Muhammad , he is undoubtedly the most fortunate among the Messengers with respect to guidance; he has the greatest number of followers, and has left behind enormous influence on earth. It is he who has laid down the foundation of justice, and it is he through whom Allah caused the best Ummah to evolve to mankind. He has reared the most honorable generations that are reckoned with justice, kindness, excellence and knowledge. Through him Allah eliminated evil from the world, extinguished the fire of the Magian, destroyed the crosses of the Nassara (the Christians), delivered the Arabs from deviation, eliminated the oppression of the Persian kings and Roman paganism. Thus Allah has established for him his mission, nation, and justice, and the world shone with light after its darkness. What were Persian, Roman and the Arabian peninsula like before his advent? The Messenger of Allah is the most influential reformer in the whole world, according to the testimony of the unbelievers as quoted from the Encyclopedia Britannica:

"From the very beginning of Islam, Muhammad had inculcated a sense of brotherhood and a bond of faith among his followers, both of which helped to develop among them a feeling of close relationship that accentuated by their experiences of persecution as a nascent community in Mecca. "

If the unbelievers have fairly testified to the truth respecting the Messenger of Allah () , then how can Khomeini deny the merit of the Messenger of Allah () and the guided caliphs? He also denies the merits of alleged imams from Ahlil-Beit, although he claims to rank them far above all the Messengers, Prophets and angels. He reviles them all and lowers their estimation, alleging that none of them was able to establish justice on earth, or was successful in reforming humanity.

Is not this apostasy, and denouncement of the testimony of Allah in favor of His Messenger? "O Prophet, We surely have send you as a Witness, an Announcer of glad tidings and as a Warner." "And an Inviter to Allah by His command, and as a shining lamp." (33.45, 46) Has this shining lamp that shed over the whole universe the light of justice, mercy and guidance failed in directing men to the right path, and not succeeded in establishing the bases of justice? Denying this fact is beyond doubt an insolent repudiation of Allah's testimony, and rejection of the tangible facts. Such denial and reputation was not ventured upon even by the heads of the unbelievers or by the polytheists. Rather, all the nations of disbelief testify that the Messenger of Allah has laid down the foundation of justice in a unique manner comparable to none of those before him, and that the caliphs after him and his companions diffused knowledge, justice, guidance and light everywhere. They were the best models of purity, knowledge and justice known to mankind. Who amongst men, other than Prophets, can match Abu Bakr al-Siddiq or Al-Farooq Umar in purity, fairness, mercy, or perseverance? Are not the companions of the Prophet and the Muslims after them the ones who delivered the people from worshipping men to worshipping the Lord of men alone, and saved them from the dictation of the religions to the justice of Islam? Anyone who has the slightest doubt regarding these facts is an apostate and an ungrateful person whose heart is full of animosity and jealousy against the Ummah of Muhammad .

Khomeini has surely based his assertions on his blasphemous belief that the companions of the Prophet were all apostate traitors except three to five of them. And he along with the rest of his atheist Zindiq clique impute kufr to the companions of the best of Allah's Messengers, revile the Mothers of the Believers, the wives of the Prophet, and curse the best of people after the Messenger . Such beliefs are nothing but clear blasphemy, because they defy the testimony of Allah of the excellence of those pious men. Allah says, "They are the best people," but Khomeini and his gang bear false witness that they are the worst of people, denying that Allah is pleased with them, and that He turned to them with mercy. He says, "Surely Allah W9S well pleased with the believers when they were swearing allegiance to you under the tree." (48.19) They were fourteen-hundred men in the Hudaibiyah. Allah the Exalted also says, "Allah has certainly turned with mercy to the Prophet and to the Muhajereen (the emigrants) sad the Ansar (the supporters) who followed him in the hour of distress." (9.116) They were thirty thousand. The verse was revealed in reference to this group of the Prophet's companions, may Allah be pleased with them all. Allah also says, "Allah has promised to those of you who believe and do good deeds that He will surely male them successors on earth as He made successors from among those who were before you." (24.55)

Allah has certainly fulfilled His promise, and made them successors, and established for them their religion, and perfected His favor upon them, praise be to Him. But the unbelievers say He did nothing of this sort for them. On the contrary, those companions, Khomeini and his people say, changed the religion of Allah, after the death of the Prophet, and tampered with the Book of Allah, and passed the office of Caliphate to those who did not deserve it, and withheld it from those who did. Those zindiqs denounce the testimony of Allah and His Messenger and persist in their infidelity, and accuse Ali, whom they claim to love most, of being too cowardly to demand his rights, or to oppose the first three caliphs, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman, or to denounce-so they claim-their changing of the laws of Allah! Khomeini and his gang not only deride Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, but also believe that Ali's remissness culminated in giving his daughter in marriage to Umar, whom he considered an unbeliever, (so they claim). His fear persisted even after he was in authority, and he was unable to produce the true 'hidden Qur'an', and the complete revelation which was sent down to his wife Fatimah! Rather he concealed all this for fear of people! Thus he, like the Messenger before him failed in his mission, and neither he nor the Messenger of Allah was able to lay down the foundation of justice!

The above is just a brief summary of the tenets of the zindiqs regarding Ali bin Abi Talib, and the Messenger of Allah ; it is plain disbelief. They venture upon reviling them under the pretext of zeal and in the name of Islam but of course they couch with words of love their derision and reviling. The fact remains that they still accuse Ali of having been a coward until his death. Khomeini and his followers insolently hold the Messenger of Allah , Ali and his offsprings in light estimation as expressed literally by Khomeini: "Even the Prophets, and the forefathers of imam al-mahdi failed in what they set out to achieve."

The dotards and liars claim that the alleged imam Muhammad bin al-Hasan al-Askari will succeed where those before him failed, in guiding humanity and in laying down the foundations of justice on earth. This is a blasphemous assertion for many reasons:

l-This imaginary mahdi has never existed in the past nor does he or will he exist. They allege that the non-existent mahdi was a three or four year-old boy who encompassed the knowledge of this life as well as the Hereafter's, who entered a tunnel in Samirra, Iraq since 260H. and never came out again. This is nothing other than sheer dotage and mythology, because al-Hasan alAskari never had a son. It is only a fiction invented to deceive the Shiite mob in order to plunder their money in the names of the imams, under the pretext of supporting the Prophet's household. Upon realizing that the alleged Imamate will be interrupted if the last of the imams did not have a son, they invented this lie to keep the open door of lies against Allah and His Messages, and to keep devouring the unlawful wealth. Neither the Qur'an nor the Sunnah referred to such an event. It was not even hinted at by any of their imams. An imam who remains in his hiding for twelve hundred years, and does not come out of the tunnel is not credible. Allah is never forgetful. Allah has referred in His Book to the great events, in general, until the Day of Judgment, and the Messenger () spoke of every minor and major event. How is it possible then that he did not speak of this mythical imam who will have greater influence and blessing than all of the Prophets and Messengers?! Did he speak of his upbringing, his absence, disappearance or reemergence, or of his deputies and spokesmen like Khomeini and the others? Is it credible that the Messenger of Allah, , who spoke of a fire which will break out in Medina whose flame will be tall enough to be reflected on the necks of the camels in Basra, Iraq, but neglected to inform us of the greatest event (!) which will take place after his death? What is the importance of the fire of Medina compared to that of the Shiite Mahdi, (!) whom they consider to be greater than the Messengers, Prophets and imams?! ! In brief, the myth of the alleged imam is speaking of the unseen, and is a gross heresy. While believing that the alleged imam is still alive after these long years is also an invented lie against Allah, and blasphemy.

The assertion that the birthday of the Mahdi is the greatest holiday for all mankind, (!), and that he will guide all men to the straight path, is made only by one who is ignorant of the institutes of Allah which He manifested to men. Allah has already ordained that mankind is not to gather under one single religion, nor to be all guided; there shall be no alteration of the statutes of Allah. They must be divided into believers and unbelievers.

Due to the infinite wisdom of Allah, the unbelievers are to constitute the majority in every time and everywhere. Allah says: "And most men will not believe even though you eagerly desire it." ( 12.1 02) And, "And if you obey the majority of those on earth, they will lead you astray from Allah's way." (6.116) also, "But few of My slaves are grateful." (34.13)

Khomeini asserts, "The birthday of the Mahdi is greater to the Muslims than the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad ". This is plain blasphemy because he considers the imaginary mahdi, who is nothing other than a myth, to be superior to the Messenger of Allah, the best of the Messengers and the most honorable of mankind, and their chief on the Day of Judgment."

Although celebrating birthdays of the Messengers and others is not sanctioned in Islam, Khomeini makes incumbent, according to his secretive religion, the aggrandizing of the alleged mahdi, even more than the Messenger of Allah . This also constitutes a plain blasphemy.

4-Once we know that Khomeini has appointed himself a deputy to the alleged imam by virtue of the latter's command (!) to prepare the earth and the state for his emergence, we realize that Khomeini's ultimate objective of aggrandizing his mahdi is to render himself aggrandized. If the mahdi, is greater than all the Messengers, then his deputy is great by virtue of his greatness, and grand by virtue of his grandeur. Thus it has become easy for Khomeini to make his blind followers believe him to be the leader, to add his name jointly with the name of Allah in the call to prayer 'athan' in the mosques in Iran, to make it a slogan for the mobs to shout it everywhere, even during Hajj in Masjid alHaram, the Sacred Mosque in Mecca, shrieking, "Allahu akbar Khomeini rahbar, labbaik ya Khomeini," meaning: "Allah is the greatest, Khomeini is the leader; here we are responding to you, Khomeini"!, instead of calling out, "Labbaik Allahumma Labbaik," meaning, "Here we are, responding to your call, O Allah" as the Prophet commanded us to call during the Hajj rituals. Those same followers of Khomeini describe him as, 'Ibraheem of the age', and 'Musa of the time'! Thus he is to them equal to 'Ibraheem, Kalilu-Allah' (the friend of Allah) and 'Musa to whom Allah has spoken.'

Once it has become clear that the alleged mahdi never did nor will exist, it becomes clear too that Khomeini invented this new heresy in the religion only to set himself up as the legislating lord and the ultimate ruler, to whom all affairs are referred. Otherwise, who else can rule people in the name of an absent prophet, and a hiding mahdi who is to them better than all Messengers? This is exactly what Khomeini is seeking to achieve in accordance with the constitution which he composed and detailed to set himself up as the leader of the nation of which article 5 reads, "During the time when the 12th imam is in occultation, in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the leadership of the affairs and guidance of the people is the responsibility of a just and pious jurisprudent."!

Therefore, he has made it easy for his blind followers and mobs to hand over to him both the legislative and the executive powers, to legalize, prohibit and opine as he chooses regardless of the nation's will. It is impossible to disagree with the deputy of the infallible imam!! And since Khomeini is the deputy of the infallible imam who is superior to all of the Messengers, as he claims, to oppose him is to oppose Allah, and consequently opposing him is blasphemy and apostasy!!

In this manner Khomeini subdues his opponents even though they belong to his religion, because opposing the deputy of the infallible imam is apostasy! Claiming infallibility, holding the right of legislation and assuming absolute authority constitute kufr, because by so doing Khomeini places his words in lieu of the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger.

It is known to us, Ahl al-Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah, that we are commanded rulers and ruled to refer our disputes to Allah and His Messenger . Allah the Exalted says, "And if you differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger." Once Khomeini appointed himself the deputy of the infallible imam(!), he made it incumbent to refer to him, the lawmaker, any dispute which may occur in the Council of Shura, within the Council of Ministers or in any other department, according to the Iranian constitution, which we will discuss later on. All this is done so that the blind mob will march behind him in what they call 'the path of the imam', void of their minds, adhering to this Zindiq who rules them with fire and iron, turning some of them against the others, and creating corruption on earth following the footsteps of his forefathers the Karmathians, the Mongolians, the Ubaidis or the like thereof. Khomeini and his followers are surpassing all those before them in destruction and evil.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0