Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Dragged through streets

25 posts in this topic


This assertion was one of the reasons the Muslim scholars condemned Khomeini to blasphemy and apostasy. He states:

"Fatimah al-Zahra lived 75 days after the death of her father, during which she was sad and lonely. Jibreel used to visit and console her, and informed her about all the events which will take place in the future. It appears from this narration that Jibreel during the 75 days used to visit her often, and I do not think that a narration like this related to anyone other than the great prophets. Imam Ali used to write those revelations which were transmitted to her by Jibreel. It is possible though that the affairs of Iran were among the things revealed to her (!) We do not know, but it is quite possible, because imam Ali was the one who wrote down the revelation as he was the scribe of the Messenger . The descending of Jibreel on a person is not simple or an easy issue, and I do not believe that Jibreel descends on any person; there must be harmony between the spirit of whom Jibreel descends on and Jibreel himself, who is considered to be the 'greatest spirit'. This harmony existed between Jibreel and the first-class Prophets such as the Messenger (), Eesa, Musa, Ibraheem and the like. Jibreel never descended on any other than these. I could not even find a narration referring to the descending of Jibreel on the imams. Thus this excellent status was enjoyed by none after the Prophets other than Fatimah. It is one of the merits with which Fatimah was distinguished."

This statement includes many blasphemous aspects:

1-Khomeini's denouncement of the belief which is unanimously agreed upon by the Muslims, that Prophethood and revelation ceased to continue after the death of the Messenger of Allah , as confirmed by the words of Allah:

"Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the best of the Prophets" (33.40), and by the Messenger's words: "..and He has closed the line of Prophethood with me; there is no prophet after me." (authentic hadeeth) There is consensus among the ummah (the Muslim nation) on this belief which Khomeini has opposed and contradicted by his claim that Jibreel descended on Fatimah, and brought down to her a complete Qur'an, which the Shiite books allege was three times larger than our Qur'an.

2-The second blasphemous aspect in his statement is the claim that it is possible that women can be messengers and prophets and receive revelation. But Allah says, "..And We sent not before you (as Messengers) but men to whom We sent revelation." (12.109)

As for the word 'revelation' that was mentioned in reference to the wife of Imran, Maryam and the mother of Musa, it means only 'inspiration', as Allah says: "And your Lord revealed to the bees," meaning, "He inspired the bees". Neither the mother of Musa nor the wife of Imran were prophets or messengers, but Khomeini made of Fatimah a messenger-prophet who received revelation through Jibreel.

3-The third blasphemous aspect is that he holds Fatimah as superior to the Messenger of Allah (), and to Ali whom he considers the appointed imam. Claiming that he was only Fatimah's scribe!! Yet Khomeini claims that the revelation which was revealed to her was more perfect than that revealed to the Messenger himself. According to Khomeini and his sect it was a chaste Qur'an.

Whatever the case might be, Khomeini copied the statements of the Zindiq before him. Al-Kulainin, whom they call 'HujjatulIslam' , wrote in his book 'al-Kafi' which is held by the Shiites as the most authentic reference of the Prophetic tradition collection, the following forged lie against the family of the Prophet , under the head line, [Chapter which includes the reference to 'Sahifah = sheet', 'al-Jafr = bookcase' 'alJami'ah = the collection' and 'Mushaf Fatimah = the qur'an of Fatimah'], the following:

I-Abu Basir said, "I entered on Abu Abdullah, peace be on him, and said to him, 'May I be your ransom, I would like to ask you a question. Is there anyone around here who may be listening t o my words?' Then Abu Abdullah pulled up a curtain separating between him and another room and looked and said, 'Abu Muhammad, ask whatever you wish'. I said, 'May I be your ransom, your Shiite followers are saying that the Messenger of Allah taught Ali, peace be on him, a chapter through which will open to him a thousand chapters.' He said, 'Abu Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah taught Ali a thousand chapters, and each chapter opens u p to a thousand chapters.' I said, 'By Allah, this indeed is the knowledge.' He said, 'It is, but not the knowledge. Then he said, 'Abu Muhammad, we have al-Jami'ah. What do they know about al-Jami'ah? I said, 'May I be your ransom, what is alJami'ah?' He said, 'It is a seventy-yard-long sheet dictated by the Messenger of Allah to Ali. It contains the names of every lawful and unlawful thing, and everything the people need.' I said, 'By Allah, this is the knowledge.' He said, 'It is, but not the knowledge.'

Then he said, 'And we have al-Jafr, what do they know about al-Jafr? I said, 'What is al-Jafr?' He said, 'It is a leather pouch containing the knowledge of the prophets, the guardians, the dead scholars of the Children of Israel.' I said, 'This is the knowledge.' He said, 'It is, but not the knowledge.' Then he said, 'And we have the qur'an of Fatimah, may peace be on her.' I said, 'What is the qur'an of Fatimah, peace be on her?' He said, 'It contains three times as much as your Qur'an does. By Allah, it does not have one letter of your Qur'an.' I said: 'This, by Allah is the knowledge.' He said, 'It is knowledge but not that.' Then He said, 'We have the knowledge of what happened and what will happen till the Final Hour is established.' I said, 'May I be your ransom! By Allah this is the knowledge.' He said, 'It is knowledge, but not that.' I said, 'May I be your ransom! What is the knowledge then?' He said, 'Whatever happens in the night and day, and the affair after the affair, and the thing after the thing till the Day of Judgment."

Alkulaini also reported:

"Hammad said: 'I heard Abu Abdullah, peace be on him, saying, 'zindiqs will appear in the year 128H. That is because I looked in the qur'an of Fatimah, peace be on her.' I said, 'What is qur'an of Fatimah?' He said, 'When Allah collected His Prophet she was overcome by sadness which only Allah knows the depth of, then He sent to her an angel to console, and communicate to her; so she informed Amir alMu'mineen Ali, peace be on him, who told her: 'Let me know when this happens.' She heard the sound and informed Ali. He began to write all he heard until he compiled them in a mus-haf. He said, "It surely contains nothing of the halal and haram, but it contains the knowledge of what will happen." (!!)

Having been acquainted with the contents of al-Kafi, one may realize that Khomeini is not the first to forge lies against Fatimah and Ali. He was preceded by the zindiqs before him who transmitted such dotage and myths, by which they try to impugn the image of Fatimah and Ali, may Allah be pleased with them. They both are far from what the apostate impute to them.

We demand and challenge those zindiqs time after time to produce the alleged qur'an of Fatimah. Why did not she confront those who disobeyed the command of Allah, as you claim? O, atheistic zindiqs, we ask all of you, Where is that material which Ali supposedly wrote? Why did he not publish and publicize it during the five-year period of his rule? Where was the fabricated qur'an?

The fourth blasphemous aspect is the claim that the qur'an revealed to Fatimah is in existence, and that it is kept with the absent imam, and that Ali was not successful in publicizing it during his caliphate. Khomeini says: "Ali, peace be on him, did not have the chance to unveil the knowledge of truth, and this knowledge of truth is that which the Prophet whispered in Ali's ear. Ali himself said, 'The knowledge which the Prophet whispered in my ear contains thousands of chapters of knowledge.' It is unfortunate that the chance was not available to Ali nor to his succeeding imams to bring out this knowledge. Nor did they find a person fit enough to carry it, and to clarify the true meaning of the Qur'anic teachings. Thus the imam departed with the knowledge of truth''!(2)

With these words, Khomeini accuses Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, that he concealed the qur'an of Fatimah as well as the knowledge privately communicated to him by the Messenger of Allah, and did not publish it, even though he was Caliph for five years. Where is this knowledge???

This is a blasphemous statement because it contains an accusation of the Messenger of Allah, for having betrayed the trust of conveying the Message to all people, but distinguished with it some over the others. Far removed is he from what they impute to him. They impute the same to Ali for leaving the Muslims without the knowledge of truth, according to their claims.

In brief, those liars seek to impugn the reputation of the household of the Messenger of Allah . As for Fatimah, may Allah be pleased with her, she is the lady of the women in Jannah, and she is far removed from their filthy lies. It is an established fact that whoever claims prophethood, or receiving revelation, is a liar Zindiq like Musailamah, Sajah, al-Aswad al- Ansi, al-Mukhtar, al-Thaqafi and the like who claimed to be prophets.

These filthy people, hold the love of the household (Ahl alBait) of the Messenger of Allah () as a cover under which they hide their blasphemy and atheism. My Muslim brothers, watch over and heed.

(2) "Khomeini's Method in the Scale of the Islamic Thought," as reviewed by the Pakistani magazine 'Ishya', September 23,1984.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Like the rest of the zindiqs, who bear malice and hatred against Islam and its people, who revile the Messenger of Allah and his companions, and who are hiding under the pretext of the love of Ahl al- Bait, Khomeini says:

"We are not dealing, at this point, with the two shaikhs, or with whatever violations they committed against the Qur'an, tampered with the commands of Allah, declared things lawful and things unlawful on their own accord, practiced oppression against Fatimah, the daughter of the Prophet and her sons. But we want to point out their ignorance of the commands of Allah and the religion. People like those ignorant fools, hobos and tyrants were not fit to be in the office of Imamate, nor to be included among the people of authority." (3)

The liar further asserts:

"It is quite obvious from all that has preceded that the violations of the two shaikhs against the Qur'an were not of great importance to the Muslims. That is because they were either in the party of the two shaikhs and supportive of them or against them, but did not dare to say a thing to those who treated the Messenger of Allah and his daughter the way they did. Even if one of the opposition was to say something, his words would pass unattended to, even if these issues were mentioned in the Qur'an. Those two would not have refrained from their way, nor would have they abdicated their office.'' (4)

(3) Khomeini, Kashf al-Asrar, pp. 107, 108. (4) ibid, pp. 116.

The malevolent Khomeini refers to al-Farooq Umar, may Allah be pleased with him and despites his enemies, saying:

"The actions of Umar issued forth from disbelief and heresies and the violations of verse mentioned in the Qur'an." (5)

There is no doubt that these assertions reveal blasphemy and apostasy, and deviation from the path of the believers for many reasons;

1- reviling the two shaikhs and imputing to them disbelief and apostasy, and accusing them of violating the Qur'an willfully and ignorantly, and imputing to them foolishness and tyranny is, first of all discrediting the testimony of the Lord of the Worlds, Subhanahu, Who praised them, and chose them to be the company of His Prophet, the most honorable of His creatures, and distinguished them with guidance, those who fought continuously alongside His Messenger in all battles. The Messenger of Allah () married their daughters, and spoke well of them above the other companions. He testified to their admittance to Jannah, and they enjoyed Allah's pleasure. All the Muslim ummah testified to their excellence except the apostate and the heretic who has rebelled against the consensus of the ummah. Allah the Exalted says, "If you do not help him, then know that Allah helped him when the disbelievers drove him forth when he was one of the two, when they were both in the cave." (9.40)

Here is a testimony from Allah in favor of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, may Allah be pleased with him, who was with the Prophet when both of them were hiding in the cave when they took flight to Medina, which was one of the most difficult situations the Prophet endured.

Reviling Abu Bakr means rejecting Allah's testimony: "But the righteous one shall be kept away from it (the Fire), who gives his wealth (in charity) to become purified. And he owes no favor to anyone which must be repaid." (92.17, 18, 19) The exegetes unanimously agree that these verses refer to Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, [s) ibid, pp. 117. who used to buy slaves with his own money and set them free, seeking the pleasure of Allah. To revile him means also holding Allah, extolled be His glory, in light estimation, for He chose him to be the first man to enter the fold of Islam, and a multitude of men were guided by him in the early stages of Islam. Allah chose him to keep the company of His Messenger throughout his life, before and after Prophethood. When he died, his body was laid beside the body of the Messenger of Allah and Umar, that their companionship be extended to the Hereafter.

Reviling al-Siddiq necessitates impugning the Messenger of Allah who chose him to be his companion throughout his life. When the Messenger of Allah was asked, 'Who among people is dearest to you?' he said, 'A'ishah.' Then he was asked, 'And of men? He replied, 'Her father.' (Bukhari & Muslim) He also said, "If I were to take from the people of the earth a friend, I would take Abu Bakr, but the brotherhood of Islam and its love suffice."

It is unanimously agreed that he who reviles al-Siddiq reviles Allah the Exalted and the Messenger of Allah, who married his daughter and lived with her for the rest of his life. Therefore if al-Siddiq was ignorant, a s Khomeini (the insolent liar claims), then this is directed to the Messenger of Allah because he failed to teach his companion throughout the period of their company; and if al-Siddiq was a tyrant and unjust, as the liar claims, then it is his companion, the Prophet ,, who would be to blame.

One may ask Khomeini and all the zindiqs like him, "Was the Messenger of Allah aware of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq's disbelief, ignorance and injustice or not?" If their answer is in the negative, then they declare themselves unbelievers and apostate, for they would be imputing ignorance and poor judgment to the Messenger of Allah () for being unable to know the characteristics of his life-companion. And if they say, 'Yes, he knew that Abu Bakr was ignorant and unjust, but he kept silent, even praised him instead, married his daughter, died while his head was on her chest, and appointed him to lead the congregational prayers.' If they testify to all this then they declare themselves disbelievers, because it is impossible that the Messenger of Allah would have approved of falsehood or erroneous behavior, nor would it have behooved him to do so. Whichever of the two answers they might give shows their disbelief.

We also ask these atheists, "Where was Allah the Exalted when both al-Siddiq and al-Farook were deceiving His Prophet, as you claim, seeking to gain power after him? Why did Allah not reveal Qur'anic verses to expose them, at a time when Allah was revealing words in reference to much less important issues than theirs? At one time Allah revealed verses exposing a hypocrite who lagged behind in one of the battles, and another who slandered the Prophet by a word. Others were exposed for having built a mosque as a detriment to the believers. How then is it possible that Allah did not expose those who manipulated His Messenger, as you contemptuously assert, tampered with His religion, and oppressed the family of His Prophet? If you say that Allah knew all that but did not expose them, you would certainly testify against yourselves with apostasy by imputing to Allah the imperfection of not cautioning His Messenger against them and thus of approving of error and falsehood; far removed is He from your attribution. And if you say that Allah did reveal words exposing them, we would demand of you to bring forth your proof We further ask you, why did not the Prophet make public those words or at least warn hi companion and his ummah against the two shaikhs, Abu Bakr and Umar? And why did he conceal the facts about them all his life?

"Know, you rebellious apostate, that you do not revile Abu Bakr and Umar, but rather the Messenger of Allah. In fact you revile Allah the Exalted Who is above His seven heavens, and revile too the family of the Prophet whom you claim were accomplices in the cover-up. Where was Ali when the Book of Allah was tampered with, and when the caliphate was taken by force? Why did he not speak up? Why was he the main supporter and advisor of Abu Bakr and Umar? And where was the rest of the household of the Prophet during the alleged ordeal?

You reiterate that the two shaikhs disinherited Ali and Fatimah of the Prophet's estate, that Fatimah litigated against al-Siddiq over this issue, and that Ali and al-Abbas debated with both of the shaikhs, demanding their rights of the inheritance. We say, this did take place, but the accusation you level against the two shaikhs, of changing the religion of Allah, and taking over the caliphate by force, are far more serious than the mundane issue of disinheritance. Did Ali, Fatimah and al-Abbas have greater concern over a piece of land than over the religion of Allah and the leadership of the Muslim ummah? Did they litigate with the two shaikhs respecting the inheritance and neglect litigating over changing the religion of Allah and tampering with His Book? Did they recover their courage when it came to claiming their own rights and lose it when it came to claiming the rights of Allah? This is the worst insult you could level against the family of the Prophet h . Where were the hundreds of thousands of Muslims when the religion of Allah was being tampered with? Were those Muslims who sacrificed their property and lives seeking the pleasure of Allah too cowardly to rectify the wrong? It is they whom Allah praised and made them the best nation evolved to mankind. Of course, you claim that they all returned from Islam to disbelief except for three or five of them.

"You turned from Islam to disbelief the moment you imputed ignorance to Allah, and asserted that He approves of injustice and the unjust, giving unbelievers a free hand in playing havoc with His religion; far removed is He from what you impute to Him."

"Allah has promised to guard His Book, saying, "Verily, We have sent down al-dthikr (the Qur'an), and most certainly We will be its guardians." (15.9) But you most certainly are apostate by denying that Allah has fulfilled His promise, that He did not establish for His Messenger and his nation after him the religion, Abu Bakr and Umar did not give out the estate left by the Prophet to his hiers due to the fact that the Prophet () instructed: "We Prophets do not bequeath: Our estate which we leave behind goes to charity."and praised the evil people, making them the best. You turned to apostasy when you claimed that Allah chose for His beloved Messenger hypocrites, liars and deceitful people. You turned to blasphemy when you imputed to the Messenger of Allah ignorance of the two shaikhs. You disbelieved in Allah when you alleged that the Messenger of Allah married the daughters of the hypocrites and unbelievers, and when you alleged that he kept both A'ishah and Hafsah as his wives knowing that they were unbelievers. You returned to unbelief when you imputed lying to Allah, Extolled be His glory, for praising the Ummah of Muhammad in His Book:

"Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those who are with him are hard against the unbelievers, kind among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating themselves in prayer seeking grace from A0ah and His pleasure. Their marks are upon their faces, being the traces of prostration. This is their description in the Torah, and their description in the Gospel is like a seed produce that sends forth its sprouts, then makes it strong; it then becomes thick, and stands firm on its stem, delighting the sowers that He may cause the disbelievers to burn with rage..." (48.29)

"I am sorry, you actually did not return to apostasy, because you never believed, nor did you ever enter the fold of Islam, nor did you believe in the Book of Allah or His Messenger . Your claim of belief is only evasion and falsehood, and your claim of supporting the family of the Prophet is a lie, because you are in truth the worst enemy of his family. You claimed that every filthy liar and a crook who was not an Arab, was a member of the household of the Prophet . How could those with their unchaste tongues be the most honorable of people and belong to the family of the Prophet?

Lo, know you that Allah holds the family of the Prophet innocent of your filth, and far away from your falsehood, and protects them from your planning." In brief, by reviling the two shaikhs Khomeini reviles Allah, His Messenger and his pure family, as well as the great honorable ummah which Allah praised, making bear witness against the first and the last nations saying, "Thus have We made you an exalted nation, that you may bear witness against people, and the Messenger bear witness against you." (2.143)

Praise be to Allah Who has testified to the goodness, virtue and excellence of the ummah of Muhammad , to the strong faith of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq and Umar, and to their admittance to Jannah. May Allah's curse be on every malicious and spiteful detractor who is against the great guided ummah.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Muslims today face the worst catastrophe in modem history, Khomeini's Shiite revolution in Iran, with its readiness to destroy the Muslim world by setting up the alternative regime and creed. Since this regime uses religious occasions as a pretext to spew its venom and shield its deviant tenets, it has become incumbent upon us to be aware of this fact.

Rabi' al-Awwal is one of those occasions used by Khomeini's regime in Tehran to deceive Muslims by celebrating the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad to mislead the simple-minded and the ignorant into thinking that he exalts and commemorates the Messenger of Allah . But the fact of the matter is to the contrary. Khomeini and his gang revile the Messenger of Allah and impute to him all kinds of falsehood and lies as necessitated by their beliefs. The Messenger of Allah is removed from their lies. According to their beliefs he was traitorous, ignorant, cowardly, and hypocritical, failing to properly convey the Message and to guide the people, and unfit for the Mission he was assigned. They claim that he gathered around him the worst of people, the ignorant Bedouins, and made them his associates, supporters and beloved ones, he married their daughters and gave them his daughters in marriage. In return they were ungrateful to him and did not deserve this honor. They changed his religion, altered his laws, breached his trust, plundered his family's rights, devoured his inheritance, and tampered with the Book of Allah. These are some of the beliefs of Khomeini and his gang in brief, as detailed hereunder:

Khomeini has become the representative of Shiite, thought which was hidden in the tenet of taqiyyah(7) for a long time, and has gone a step further by making obvious what was once

(7) See Glossary 40 allusion, and textualized the connotations of their beliefs.

In his speech on the occasion of the 15th of Shaaban, he claimed that their imam will succeed where all those before him, including the Messenger of Allah failed. As a result, the Muslim scholars issued their fatwas condemning Khomeini to blasphemy for deriding and holding in contempt the Messenger of Allah .

In another speech he delivered on 'Women's Day' (2.3.1986), he claimed that Jibreel, peace be on him, brought down revelation to Fatimah, may Allah be pleased with her, for 75 days after the death of the Messenger of Allah, and that Ali was her scribe. By so claiming, he refers to what all the Shiites quote from their own books: that they have the qur'an of Fatimah, which is three times larger than ours and does not include a single letter from ours.

Thus Khomeini brings to light what was hidden and holds Fatimah to be superior to the Messenger , because the qur'an which she received was unalterable and three times larger than the alterable one which her father received.

He claims that those who are fighting under his leadership against Iraq and the Muslim countries, and spreading evil everywhere in the world, are more courageous and better than those who fought with the Messenger of Allah .

In his book 'Kashf al-Asrar', Khomeini asserts, "The charge of tampering with the Book of Allah with which the Muslims indict the Jews and Christians, is only established against the Prophet's companions." He further elaborated in the same book, "It was easy for them (the Prophet's companions) to delete verses from the Qur'an, subject the Divine Scripture to alteration, and hide it away from people."

He who thinks that Khomeini and his gang gratify and love the Prophet's family is mistaken. In fact they use the false display of love to conceal malice against Islam, and justify cursing the first and the last of the ummah, and reviling every member from the Household of the Prophet called for the unity of the Muslims, or anyone who speaks we11 of the companions of the Messenger of Allah . On Ghadir's Day Khomeini criticized Ali for accepting arbitration in the battle of Siffeen, and al-Hassan for abdicating leadership to Mu'awiyah. He also claimed that Ali was not successful in establishing the Islamic regime as it should have been, and that neither he nor the Messenger, nor those after him, succeeded in applying Islam or in establishing the Islamic state, as well as that Divine Justice, has not been established yet.

Only he (of course!) on behalf of the absent imam, succeeded in establishing the Islamic government and the Divine Justice. His supposedly Islamic rule is massacring tens of thousands on the gallows and in prisons, apprehending hundreds of thousands more and sending them to jails.

We mentioned earlier that Khomeini came to represent Shiite thought and to reveal what was concealed implementing it in the Iranian constitution, of which Article 5 reads:

"During the time when the twelfth imam (may god expedite his appearance) is in occultation, in the Islamic Republic of Iran, the leadership of affairs and the guidance of the people is the responsibility of a just and pious jurisprudent, aware of the times, courageously applying drive and initiative, whom the majority of the people know and accept to be the leader...."

Article 12 reads:

"The official religion of Iran is Islam of the Ja'fari 12 _s sect, and this article is inalterable in perpetuity...."

By virtue of this constitution, Khomeini appoints himself as an imam and a deputy of the absent imam, who never existed and never will. He also designated Ja'fari thought as the state religion. Ali is far from being associated with this line of thought. He never claimed that a revelation came to him, or that he was his wife's scribe, nor did he claim that he enjoyed a status above that of the Prophet or of Abu Bakr and Umar, let alone above that of all the messengers and angels. He never claimed that there would be twelve imams from his offsprings, or called any group the twelfth imamers, possessing a different qur'an and changing the words of the 'azan' (call for prayer). Neither did he revile those guided caliphs before him. Rather, he attested to their superiority over him, and wished to meet Allah having done deeds like those of Umar. In fact he announced in public that there would never be a man like Umar again.

This is the creed of Ali bin Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, the leader of the pious, and of his army and supporters. The exception was al-Khawarij, who rebelled and imputed to him disbelief; therefore he fought and conquered them.

As for the Shiites to whom Khomeini and his gang relate, they upheld the heretical beliefs throughout the centuries, giving up the deification of khosraus, the Persian kings and the Magian fire worshippers but deifying those whom they called '_'. Khomeini and his gang are the descendants of Abdullah bin Saba', the Jew who desired to corrupt the religion of the Muslims, who found an audience among the Persian mobs and the ignorant people. It was they who said to A1i, "You are Allah". For that, he burnt them to death. They threw themselves into the fire, saying, "I hasten me to you, my lord, that you may be pleased. Now we know for sure that you are Allah, because no one punishes with fire except Allah." Their followers, void of sense, passed on their heresies to those after them, who in turn take every opportunity to vent their hatred on Muslims and to vilify the Messenger of Allah directly and indirectly.

They charge the Prophet with being afraid and evasive, unable to appoint Ali publicly as his successor until Allah warned him: "O, Messenger, convey to people what has been revealed to you from your Lord. If you do not, you have not conveyed His Message; and Allah protects you from people." (5.67)

They falsely claim that the above verse originally read as follows: "...convey what has been revealed to you respecting Ali...." And they interpret the word 'people' in the verse as referring to Abu Bakr and Umar. But they claim the Messenger was too scared to mention it to them, and make public the will and the command of Allah, lest they assemble people against him!!

Imagine how filthy-minded Khomeini and his followers are, daring to impute to the Messenger of Allah such low quality! The least intuitive of the Arabs could distinguish his enemy from his friend, particularly if he lived with him for a short while. By rights, he should have known him better if he spent most of his lifetime with him. Those hypocrites do not impugn his Prophethood only, but also his rectitude, aptitude and perception for having assembled around himself, according to Khomeini, a group of disbelievers and hypocrites who were anxiously waiting for him to die in order to take over the seat of authority, tamper with the Qur'an, oppress the members of his family and deprive them of their rights of the Imamate!!

Muslims can see for themselves how serious the accusations are with which the Prophet ;t is charged. What could be worse than this revilement of the Messenger of Allah? No man is known to have kept as dose relationship with the Messenger of Allah as Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him. There was no woman whom he loved as a wife like A'ishah, yet she has not escaped the reviling of this malicious group to the point of accusing her of hypocrisy and adultery, of which she was exonerated by the words of Allah, Who called the accusation a lie saying: "Verily, those who brought forth the lie are a group from you...." and Allah further referred to A'ishah saying: 'These are innocent of all that they (the maligners) allege. For them is forgiveness and bountiful provision." (24.26)

The apostate call Abu Bakr and Umar 'the two idols of Quraish' and nickname them 'al-Jibt' and 'al-Taghoot'. They mention them in their supplications saying, "O, Allah curse the two idols of Quraish, their Jibt and their Taghoot, and curse their two daughters," meaning the two wives of the Prophet : A'ishah, the daughter of Abu Bakr, and Hafsah, the daughter of Umar.

Jibt is sorcery, and Taghoot is every dirty beside Allah.

Those zindiqs desire to revile and defame the Messenger of Allah, but they know that doing so openly would turn the whole Muslim world against them. Therefore they declare them as apostate and resort to the crafty approach of accusing everyone around the Messenger of Allah of disbelief, evasion and hypocrisy and of following their whims for mundane gain. Thus to attack the Prophet .t indirectly and to make him look like a hopeless person who was not fit to be a Messenger of Allah .

The assertion made by those zindiqs, that all the Prophet's companions apostatized save three or five, is undoubtedly meant to refute the most particular qualities of the Messenger : instructionability, cleansability and trustworthiness, for which Allah has praised him saying, "He it was Who raised among the unlettered a Messenger from among themselves to recite to them His verses, and to cleanse them and to teach them the Book and the Sunnah, although they had been before in manifest deviation." (62.2) In this verse Allah the Exalted reminds the Muslim ummah of the favors He conferred upon them by sending them the Messenger to cleanse and instruct them. He also reminds His Messenger of qualifying him for this mission, by virtue of which his ummah was qualified too.

Having been praised by Allah means that he actually did fulfill the Message perfectly. This leaves no room for doubt that His Messenger was indeed successful beyond all measure in fulfilling the Message, and in rearing well-instructed and well-cleansed companions, thus deserving the praise of Allah. Had the Messenger of Allah failed in his mission, Allah would not have commended him so often.

But this gang of heretics, Khomeini and the like, defy Allah and persist in their allegations and falsehood, saying that all except a few of the companions turned to disbelief. Even Ali, whom they consider as one of the three or five who remained in Islam, they claim was afraid to rectify the wrong!!

These are the assertions and accusations Khomeini and his followers charge the Prophet and his companions with. This is their real religion, based on animosity, leaving no room for the Messenger of Allah . or for any member of his family.

The constitution which Khomeini calls 'the constitution of the Islamic republic' turns all the power to him, disregarding the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger. This fact is clearly emphasized in the constitution. Paragraph 5 of Article 2 reads:

"Imamate and the positive leadership and sensitive role of it is in the continuity of the Islamic revolution."

Imamate is the central belief of their religion. The legislation of the Messenger of Allah it and his Sunnah are replaced in the Iranian government with a legislator whom Khomeini puts on the same level as the Prophet. This legislator is a four-year-old boy who entered a tunnel twelve hundred years ago and never came out again. In the name of this boy, a man rules who is more vile, malicious, hateful and foul tongued than any the world has ever witnessed. Khomeini has surpassed every reviler who has attacked or will attack the Messenger of Allah B and his pure companions. This same man never misses a chance to commend his idols, the worst enemies of the Messenger of Allah: Nasir al-Deen al-Toosi the Magian and Ibn al-Alqami, who were the advisors of the Mongol Holago who staged the onslaught of the Muslims in Baghdad, Iraq, which marked the end of the Abbasid caliphate. Today the heretics in Iran celebrate the birthday of the Prophet to deceive the Muslims into thinking that they adhere to his Sunnah and faith.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Khomeini has produced another blasphemous innovation in the Shiite thought: the guardianship of the jurist, upon which the Iranian constitution is based. The Shiites are divided on this issue.

What does this innovation mean, and why have the Muslim scholars notified the legal decision of condemning Khomeini to blasphemy regarding this innovation, as they have done previously regarding the other statements mentioned above?

This chapter contains a brief summary of this innovation, exposes its blasphemous aspects and the motives behind it, and discusses its effects on the Shiite religion.


Shiism is based on the doctrine that no government in Islam shall be without the presence of an imam. The imam, according to their false thought, must be appointed by an unequivocal decree. They claim that Allah commanded His Messenger to specifically appoint Ali as his successor. But the companions, the heretics assert, rejected His command in defiance, and passed on the caliphate to Abu Bakr and to Umar after him, then to Uthman, may Allah be pleased with them all, but deprived Ali of it. The Shiites stretched the lie to encompass the appointment of al Hussein by Ali, and the appointment of al-Hassan by his brother, who in turn appointed his son, and so forth.

It is a fact that 'al-Rafidhah'(8) are divided into several sects. Each of them claimed the imamate belonged to its own imam, but then the Imamate was interrupted by the death of al-Hassan al-Askari, who died without having any children. Having realized that a sudden interruption of the Imamate would put an end to their false religion and cause their sects to fall apart, they concocted the story of the imaginary son of al-Hassan al-Askari who according to their myth, slipped into a tunnel in Samirra' for fear of assassination and will reappear eventually! Those who fabricated this tale thought that they would confuse the matter, on the chance that someone would appear after a few years and be claimed to be the one! They went as far as claiming that whoever mentions Allah a certain number of times he would not die until he meets the mahdi! (9)

Since Shiism is based on this doctrine, neither Jum'ah, congregational prayers nor Jihad were established pending the reappearance of the hidden twelfth imam. But the Rafidhah felt the period of concealing their doctrine was too long. Thus the wickedness of their religion, which is based on reviling the companions of the Messenger of Allah, cursing every believing Muslim, and commending every Zindiq who opposes Allah and His Messenger, while hiding behind the household of the Prophet has become manifest. (8) See Glossary (9) "roe Islamic Government"

Since the time they fabricated their gross lie of the disappearance of their imam, the Shiites have maintained throughout the ages strong ties with the Jews, Christians, Magians and polytheists against Ahl d-Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah. The Jews masterminded and initiated Shiism through Abdullah bin Saba', the Jew who laid down the cornerstone of this false religion. The contemporary Jews, with the influence they enjoy in America, have found the opportunity to establish their rule in Palestine more peacefully, to divide the Muslim world, and to replace its faith with Shiism whose adherents have been their allies throughout the history. Therefore they have contributed generously to the establishment of the Shiite state. For the first time in the history of Shiism there is a Shiite leader who discards taqiyyah (10), calls for Jihad and for holding Jum'ah and congregational prayer even during the absence of the infallible imam! Khomeini bases this all on the doctrine called 'the guardianship of the Jurist'.

(10) See Glossary


Khomeini wrote his book 'The Islamic Government' shortly before the outbreak of the Iranian revolution. In it he asks the Shiites, "For how long will you wait before the appearance of the absent imam? We must work from now on for his appearance, to prepare the land for him, so that when he does appear he will find conditions in order and the government already established!"

He suggested a different use of the fifth or 20% of the annual income of every Shiite to be paid to al-albeit, saying, "Bani Hashim, who deserve the fifth, are sufficed by a tenth of a tenth of this amount. What are they doing with these piled millions? We can commence Jihad now, and use this wealth to establish the Islamic stato?"

Many Shiites were attracted by Khomeini's opinion, and found in it a relief from humiliation, oppression and the covert practice of their religion throughout their long history. Most of those who were excited by his ideas were the Shiite youths and the Iranian opposition parties during the Shah's autocratic, sacrilegious regime. Thus Khomeini rallied massive power behind him. But Khomeini's seniors, the leaders of their religion, objected to this new trend and considered it as such a departure from the mainstream of Shiite thought that it led to Kufr. Their religion necessitates that no Jum'ah or congregational prayers be held, nor Jihad be called, without the infallible imam. In fact Shiism in its entirety is based on this doctrine of the imamate, and only the infallible one is entitled to Imamate, to rule the people in war and peace, and to lead their prayers. How can someone else substitute for him?

The senior Shiite leaders opinion that there was no one to take the place of the infallible imam, but Khomeini solved the problem by formulating the doctrine of the deputyship of the absent infallible imam, presenting himself as the jurist who combines the conditions of justice and jurisprudence upon which the Shiites must agree.

The dissidence over the new doctrine persisted among the Shiites, but was overshadowed by the massive support which Khomeini's revolution received from all the parties who resented the Shah and his rule, coupled with the American Zionist lobby and the active Jewish propaganda which portrayed Khomeini as a mythical hero. As a result, the Muslim youth were captivated by the glitter of this revolution. They naively thought, that this man was the savior who would deliver them from tyrannical rule and loathsome colonialism. The well-orchestrated propaganda which accompanied the revolution preoccupied the Muslims, to the point that they did not endeavor to ask, "What does the doctrine of 'guardianship of the jurist' (which was enshrined in the Iranian constitution) mean?"' Or, "What does the Rafidite Iranian revolution entail?"'

Naturally, no one could hear the voice of the Shiites who opposed the blasphemous doctrine, nor the warnings of those possessed of knowledge among Ahl-al-Sunnah against this innovation, pointing out its dangerous consequences not only to Islam, but also to the world in general.


This doctrine, conceived by Khomeini, stipulates that during the absence of the infallible imam, according to the Shiite false beliefs, the guardianship(!) and leadership of the nation is the responsibility of a just and pious jurist (!!), according to Article 5 of the constitution, (cited above ). Article 57 reads:

"The governing authorities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, i.e. the legislative, executive and judicial authorities are to perform all their duties under the guardianship of the imam." And Article 107 reads:

"If the majority of the people know and confer upon one of the qualified jurists the qualities for leadership defined in Article 5 of this constitution as they are combined in the great religious authority, the leader of the Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Alozma imam Khomeini, then that jurist assumes the guardianship as well as the responsibilities derived from the two titles. Otherwise the experts elected by the people shall discuss among themselves who among the qualified jurists possesses the charisma of leadership and is recognized as the leader of the people. Otherwise they must appoint three or five jurists possessing the qualifications as members of the 'leadership council', and introduce them to the people."

The responsibilities of the leader or the deputy of the infallible imam, according to the constitution, are listed in the Article 110: 1 Appointing jurists to the council to guard the constitution;

2 Appointing the highest judicial authority in Iran;

3 Commanding of the armed forces, which entails: appointment or removal of the commander- in-chief, and appointment and removal of the general commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

4 Forming the National Defense Council, which is consisted of: - -The president of the republic, - -the prime minister, - -the minister of defense, - -the commander-in-chief, - -the general commander of the Iranian revolutionary guards - -two advisors to be appointed by the leader;

5 Appointing the commanders of the three forces, by recommendation from the supreme council of national defense;

6 Declaring war and peace, and the military mobilization by a recommendation from the above council;

7 Signing the results of presidential elections following the people's representative elections, the candidates in the presidential elections must be approved by the council, as guardians of the constitution, prior to elections.

8 Removing the president if it is in the national interest, after a supreme court decision based on inability to perform constitutional duties and upon deliverance from the national Shura council confirming the president's political incapacity;

9 Granting clemency or lightening sentences within the framework of Islamic criteria, after a recommendation from the supreme court.

Careful reading of the articles of the Iranian constitution, and the 'Guardianship of the Jurist' in particular, reveals the following facts:

1) This direction contradicts the doctrinal bases of Shiism of 'no government without the infallible imam'. For this reason, the Shiites disacknowledge the governing authority of Ahl al-Sunnah who believe that the responsibility of governing the Muslim ummah belongs to the Khalifah, who is chosen and approved by the ummah. And the Khalifah, or caliph, according to the people of truth, Ahl al-Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah is the imam whose 'Ijtihad' is subject to write or wrong, and who consults the people of knowledge, and if they differ over any issue, then the final arbiter is the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger as commended by Allah:

"O, you who believe! obey Allah, and obey the Messenger and those who are in authority among you. And if you differ any thing among yourselves, refer it to Allah and to His Messenger , if you are believing b All ah and the Last Day. That is best and most commendable in the end." (4.59)

However, the Rafidites declare that there is no governing authority without the infallible imam, and that that is no room for Ijtihad, errors, or oblivion in governing the nation!! This was only so until Khomeini who is not infallible of course, emerged with his 'guardianship of the jurist' doctrine, which is incongruous with the Rafidite basic principle. Thus to undo the first knot of Shiism.

2) The Iranian constitution gives Khomeini (who claims to possess justice, knowledge of jurisprudence, and familiarity with the present age) a mandate to concentrate all powers in his hands. Thus this jurist, the deputy of the imam, has become the lawmaker and self-appointed ruler, with unchallenged authority over all aspects of the lives of the Iranian people. He certainly exercised his authority when he removed the elected president, Bani Sadr, from office as if he were a minor employee. He also gave himself power over all levels of government, as well as the right of interpreting the religion and the absolute ijtihad.

3) It is obvious that the Iranian constitution has invested Khomeini with all this authority by virtue of the guardianship of the jurist' doctrine, and as the deputy of the absent imam. It is also obvious that the absent imam is infallible according to the Rafidite religion, and that oblivion, slips or mistakes do not apply to him. Undoubtedly, all authority originally belonging to the alleged absent imam has automatically been transferred to his deputy. Consequently, any objection directed against this deputy is, ipso facto, objection against the deputized!! For this reason everyone opposed Khomeini was destined to expulsion, isolation, banishment or death, regardless of the religious, or academic status the unfortunate may have previously earned.

In his renouned book 'The Miserable Revolution', Dr. Musa al- Musawi says: "The whole world, Muslim and non-Muslim should know that the senior jurists of Iran, and the grand men of religious authority have vehemently opposed the 'guardianship of the Jurist' doctrine and declared that it has no relevance to the religion, and that it is an innovation and deviation. The great spiritual leader Shari'atmadari, who contributed greatly to the beginning of the revolution, was about to pay the price of his life for opposing this doctrine. And when he insisted on his opposition, Khomeini sent ten thousand men with clubs to his house to kill him and his followers, shouting in unison and pointing at his house saying, "the den of espionage; it must be demolished and burnt down." The guards of imam Shari'atmadari put up a desperate struggle against the barbaric attack waged by a rising imam at the cost of two lives.

4) When Khomeini arrogated to himself the position of deputy of the alleged imam (whom he considers to be superior to the preceding imams, the Messengers and Prophets), he consequently assumed for himself the status of his imam!!!

Speaking of his alleged absent imam, Khomeini says:

"I cannot call him leader, because he is greater than that, nor can I call him the first man, because there is no one to succeed him, nor is there anyone comparable to him. Therefore, I cannot describe him with words other than 'the promised expected mahdi' whom Allah saved for mankind. So we have to prepare ourselves to behold him (!!) If we are successful, we will be able to raise our heads in pride. We hope that the other countries prepare themselves for the appearance of al-mahdi, peace be on him, and be ready for his visit." (12) (l2) Ibid

He added in the same speech: "Al-imam al-mahdi, whom Allah Subhanahu has preserved as a treasure for mankind, will work to establish justice throughout the world, and will succeed were all the prophets failed."

Thus Khomeini places his absent mahdi (who has never existed, nor will he ever) above all the prophets. And naturally, since he is the deputy of the alleged imam, he also is superior to the prophets. For this reason Khomeini's followers describe him as the 'Ibrahim of the time' and the 'Musa of this age'.

In his book, 'Master Khomeini on the Scales', Dr. Musa al-Musawi states, "Khomeini, glorifies and deifies himself to the point of appointing Fajr Hijazi as Iran's representative to the People's Council and as head of the Institution of the Oppressed, the largest financial outfit in the country.

By giving himself absolute authority, as the deputy of the imam, he acquired the title 'leader'' and made it a slogan for the mobs to call, "Allahu Akbar, Khomeini rahbar". But to further satisfy his arrogance, he added a new sentence to the 'azan', (the call for prayer), placing his name before the name of the Prophet , as follows:

"Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar Khomeini rahbar (the leader)

ash-hadu Anna Muhammadan Rasoolullah...."

5) One can imagine how the nation looks when its resources, legislation, government, and people are controlled by a foolish dotard in his eighties. By one word from his mouth he can pass a law, appoint or remove from office whomever he pleases, change the religion, or kill and torture whoever he pleases. Imagine how a man like this can drag the country to destruction, without any regrets! If a God-fearing person were to concentrate in his hands so much authority, he would produce catastrophe. How much moreso when the leader is Khomeini!?

Dr. Musawi comments: "Khomeini is a narcissist, and egotis to the point that he does not mind if the whole world is destroyed for his own ends; he can see none but himself. This is the worst attitude a dictatorial leader may possess, particularly if that leader is invested with ecclesiastical power."

Dr. Musawi further elaborates, "Of his most peculiar Shiite characteristics is the hidden grudge which he carries against anyone who has offended him once, even half a century ago. He never forgets offenses. He never forgets nor pardons an offense; and avenges at the first opportunity. Bloodshed and mass execution do not bother him, nor does Iying in public or in private embarrass him."

"When power came into his hand," Dr. Musawi elaborated, "he committed crimes that make the skin crawl. He undertakes corruption in the name of Islam, a stigma which will remain throughout history. This ascetic Taghoot, ruthless jurist, rebellious dictator and aged executioner bereaves mothers of their children, and renders children orphans. He killed as many of the sons of the Iranian people in four years as his predecessor killed in thirty years. This is the one who is indeed the worst known swindler and deceiving impostor in history."

Musawi added:

"Thus the poor Iranian people are subjects of the bloodthirsty lunatic disguised in ecclesiastic garb."

If the above are only some of Khomeini's characteristics, then how evil are the consequences of his assumption of leadership with absolute authority?

We read and hear about the daily destruction and killing. He has executed 100,000 persons during the black years of his reign. The contemporary history has not since Stalin known a more ruthless ruler than this man. However, we may not be surprised to hear of similar crimes committed by another tagoot like Stalin, but we are when a maniac tagoot like Khomeini commits all his crimes in the name of Islam and the Qur'an, spreading his evil across the Muslim world. Even the Holiest shrine, al-Masjid al-Haram in Mecca, did not escape his evil. He desired to turn it into a slaughterhouse in which the Muslims were about to be massacred. Can there be more evil than the 'the Guardianship of the jurist', the just and pious who is aware of the contemporary age?!

6) The blasphemous aspect of the articles relevant to the 'guardianship of the Jurist' enshrined in the Iranian constitution, is that it made this jurist (in whose hands lie all the powers), the final arbiter in every dispute and gave him the final word in religion. This contradicts the source of authority in Islam, Allah alone, and that any dispute between the ruler and the ruled must be referred to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger as commanded by Allah:

"And obey Allah and obey the Messenger, and those m authority among you, and if you differ in anything among yourselves then refer it to Allah and to the Messenger if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is best and most commendable the end." (4.59)

But the Iranian constitution stipulates that all disputes must be referred to the just jurist, the deputy of the absent infallible imam, Khomeini. Thus he inducted himself in the place of Allah to become the source of power and the one who executes it as well.

Since the imam, according to Shiites, is the source of power and legislation, has the right of interpreting the Qur'an, and is the one who executes the authority, Khomeini, by virtue of his position as the deputy of the alleged imam, assumes all his powers including appointing and removing from office every head of any authority in the country in accordance with Article 110, which deals with the validity of leadership.


Thus Khomeini's innovation, 'the Guardianship of the Jurist', along with the myth of the absent imam (whom, if he ever exists might or might not be content with the one who represents him) constitutes sheer blasphemy.

Blasphemous as it may be, this innovation has awakened many of the Shiites from their deep sleep to discover the falsity of this school of thought, and of the gross lie, 'the guardianship of the jurist' doctrine, because they are the first to suffer its consequences. It has made those who believe in the absolute Imamate of Khomeini and in his representation of the infallible imam gain the upper hand over the Iranian people. The Shiites who oppose Khomeini receive severe torment.

Surprisingly enough, Khomeini and those who adhere to his ominous tract of thought take pains to export their listless doctrine all over the world, and endeavor to promote it in the Muslim world, inviting the Muslims to embrace their ominous religion and to pledge allegiance to Khomeini as the imam of the whole Muslim ummah (!) and as deputy of the mythical imam! This indeed is despicable devilish insolence.

It is also surprising to find among Ahl al Sunnah those who are void of perception and discernment supporting him and preaching his ideas without being aware of the doctrinal, practical or judicial dimensions of this ominous innovation of 'Wilayat al-faqeeh', or the guardianship of the jurist!!


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Contributed By:Brother Efendi

To prove that government and authority belong to the Imām (


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rasool Allah[saw] failed in his mission [naouzobillah]



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

"All prophets came for the purpose of laying down the foundation of justice in the world, but they failed to do so; even Prophet Muhammad, the last of the Prophets who came to reform mankind And to apply justice failed too. The person who will succeed in all this and in laying down the foundation of justice in the world at all levels, and redressing the wrong is the expected mahdi....



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Visit this link "Shia Exposed"


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0